Too much time in the sun, poor things...The deniers on HotCopper have worked themselves in a tizzy over someone posting an early draft of the IPCC report online. They are under an illusion that the denialist blogger (who got the draft by registering himself as an 'expert reviewer', which anyone can do - even Monckton registered himself as such) has found the one sentence in that mammoth document that in his mind shows 'it's the sun' or 'it's cosmic rays' that's causing global warming. (He ignores the surrounding sentences in true denier fashion.)
Suddenly deniers are touting the IPCC as the reliable source of information on climate science!
(Mind you, yesterday HotCopperites were saying the earth isn't warming, and some have been arguing that an ice age cometh!)
RidiculousHowever one of the lead authors of the chapter in question, Professor Steve Sherwood (who wrote the paper on heat stress), said the claims were 'ridiculous'. From the ABC report:
Professor Steve Sherwood, the director of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of NSW, was the lead author of the chapter in question. He says the idea that the chapter he authored confirms a greater role for solar and other cosmic rays in global warming is "ridiculous"....
..."Even the sentence doesn't say what they say and certainly if you look at the context, we're really saying the opposite."
Truly ridiculousNot a single one of the HotCopper deniers has shown that they understand what the denialist blogger was talking about. Here's a link to the thread (subs req'd). They've just made the usual cut and paste posts from denier blogs, or made comments like this one from one of the resident paranoid conspiracy junkies:
UN Agenda 21 plan for enslavement of us all? What has Ben been smoking?
And another for good measure, from poor little laddie Hanrahan who has a 'thing' for the shape of the global surface temperature record. (Can some please tell him that making up stuff won't win him admiration from any quarter?)
Finally, an angry comment from Mr Misogynist himself, thalweg:
(HotCopper's share discussion board is really classy - Not!)
Denialist reading score - Fail!For the back story, see John Byatt's post here, a report on ABC PM here, an article in the Guardian and an article from Graham Readfearn. Graham's closing para says it all:
What this leak also shows is the tendency by some to dishonestly engage in an open process and to cherry-pick “facts” about climate change to suit their own arguments, while failing to consider the full body of evidence. Or in this case, failing to bother to read the very next paragraph.