Monday, November 5, 2018

Global warming is in the air, in the UAH lower troposphere

Sou | 2:16 PM Go to the first of 9 comments. Add a comment
The UAH data for October is out. John Christy and Roy Spencer from the University of Arizona Huntsville have a contract with NOAA to analyse temperature changes in the atmosphere. Each month they publish the latest data.

Deniers dislike it less than other data sets, especially since John and Roy revised the latest version considerably downwards, making their data an anomaly!

I came across a chart I prepared a few years ago and thought I'd do it over again using the latest UAH data.

Here is the result:

Figure 1 | Illustration of the trend in lower tropospheric temperature as reported by UAH. Data source: UAH

I hope you enjoyed that, and maybe your sceptical acquaintances (you have some, I expect), will learn something from it :)

Deluded deniers at WUWT

Just so you know I'm not exaggerating when I say deniers like UAH best, and/or there are those who think this is "nearly flat", here are some quotes from Anthony Watts' WUWT, a climate conspiracy blog.

Alan Tomalty thinks UAH is the "only database that counts"
November 4, 2018 at 1:25 pm
The only database that counts is the UAH one. When the data temp goes back down to equal the level in 1979 at one of the coldest periods, that will be the last nail in the coffin of the CO2 scam. At that point Nick will keep swearing that you cant trust the UAH data, but everyone else will know the game is over. Unfortunately this might not happen for 10 years.

John Tillman wrote down a whole lot of numbers and then finished up by suggesting global cooling has set in. What a drongo!
November 3, 2018 at 6:00 pm
...The Super El Nino spike over, the Plateau has returned, if not indeed global cooling. The same anomaly as 12 years ago and well below 1998.

Phoenix44 is definitely not a math whizz and can't tell straight from up. UAH temperatures are shown as an anomaly from the 1981 to 2010 average. That is, the average temperature for the thirty years from 1981 to 2010 is taken as zero. In earlier years more of the anomalies were below zero, in later years more were above it. If as she (or he) says the "average of the numbers is 0.22" then there would most obviously have to have been a very large increase in recent years! (The "average of the numbers" over the entire period is actually 0.04 °C for monthly, and 0.06 °C for annual.)
November 4, 2018 at 3:05 am
Rubbish. The data is clearly and obviously trendless. There are only three years warmer than the start point, and two of those only by tiny amounts. There are far more years that decrease from the starting point and by more than the highest increase. How can you have an increasing trend when there is literally no increase?
Just look at the data rather than run a line-fit. The average of the numbers us 0.22!

There were big downward adjustments to UAH when it started getting hotter

For those who want to quibble about what I wrote about the downward shift of UAH, and how it makes it an anomaly among datasets, consider this. The latest version (v6) shifts the trend down, with much lower temperature anomalies in the later years as shown by the grey bars.

Figure 2 | Comparison of the two most recent versions of lower tropospheric temperature as reported by UAH. Data source: UAH

There is another important dataset of the lower troposphere, prepared by Carl Mears of Remote Sensing Systems (RSS), an independent group. He released a new dataset recently, too. Here is a similar chart showing the difference between v3 and v4. The difference between versions is considerably less than for UAH, with some of the adjustments in the opposite direction.

Figure 3 | Comparison of the two most recent versions of lower tropospheric temperature as reported by RSS. Data source: RSS

The magnitude of the average annual difference between versions is much greater for UAH:
  • UAH v6 minus v5.6: -0.016 °C
  • RSS v4 minus v3.3:  +0.0005 °C
The research teams both gave their reasons for adjusting the way they calculate tropospheric temperature. I wrote about the change in TTT (troposphere) for RSS some time ago. (See the references and further reading section below for other relevant papers.)

So there you have it.

References and further reading

Mears, Carl A., and Frank J. Wentz. "A satellite-derived lower-tropospheric atmospheric temperature dataset using an optimized adjustment for diurnal effects." Journal of Climate 30, no. 19 (2017): 7695-7718. (pdf)

Mears, Carl A., and Frank J. Wentz, 2016: "Sensitivity of satellite-derived tropospheric temperature trends to the diurnal cycle adjustment." J. Climate doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0744.1 (open access)

Stephen Po-Chedley, Tyler J. Thorsen, and Qiang Fu, 2015: "Removing Diurnal Cycle Contamination in Satellite-Derived Tropospheric Temperatures: Understanding Tropical Tropospheric Trend Discrepancies." J. Climate, 28, 2274–2290. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00767.1 (pdf here h/t E Swanson)

Santer, Benjamin D., Susan Solomon, Frank J. Wentz, Qiang Fu, Stephen Po-Chedley, Carl Mears, Jeffrey F. Painter, and Céline Bonfils. "Tropospheric warming over the past two decades." Scientific Reports 7, no. 1 (2017): 2336. (open access)

Santer, Benjamin D., Stephen Po-Chedley, Mark D. Zelinka, Ivana Cvijanovic, Céline Bonfils, Paul J. Durack, Qiang Fu et al. "Human influence on the seasonal cycle of tropospheric temperature." Science 361, no. 6399 (2018). (subs req'd)

Spencer, Roy W., John R. Christy, and William D. Braswell. "UAH Version 6 global satellite temperature products: Methodology and results." Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences 53, no. 1 (2017): 121-130. (subs req'd)


  1. UHA is always right
    Until it shows less warming than RSS then that is right
    As the surface temperatures show more warming than UHA they must be wrong.
    Those warmist scientists adjust the surface to make it warmer.

    When I first run into the thinking a took the time to look into the adjustments.
    In the surface record I soon found out that the biggest adjustments reduce warming .
    I also discovered that UHA has a long history of being wrong.

    You have to be a gullible idiot to take anything you read on WUWT as true. A few moments with google will give you enough knowledge to see though their lies.
    Yet there is an entire class of fools who believe the nonsense without question.
    Because they chose too as it is easier to cope with believing the lies than than coping with the implications of Mans atmospheric experiment

    Willful ignorance may well be human society's epitaph.

  2. So nice to see you back in "graphic" action, Sou!

  3. The lower trop data set clearly is warming, it is now so obvious you can just eyeball it.

  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    1. John Christy is lying. The "hot spot" is not related to CO2 so you cannot use the hot spot as evidence for or against CO2.

    2. Comment deleted for non-compliance with the comment policy (no links to denier nonsense), plus I think it's from a person who was banned in the past.

    3. Frank is correct, of course. If anyone is interested, I've written about the "tropical hotspot", which isn't a spot and isn't very hot:

      About that tropical "hot spot"

    4. Yes I know some post those links in an attempt to get the YouTuber more views. I know the YouTuber from the past, he used to always comment on PotHoler54 videos. All made up nonsense of course.


Instead of commenting as "Anonymous", please comment using "Name/URL" and your name, initials or pseudonym or whatever. You can leave the "URL" box blank. This isn't mandatory. You can also sign in using your Google ID, Wordpress ID etc as indicated. NOTE: Some Wordpress users are having trouble signing in. If that's you, try signing in using Name/URL. Details here.

Click here to read the HotWhopper comment policy.