Over at WUWT there have been three articles about the lower troposphere temperatures. The first (archived
here) was a Guest Post by Werner Brozek and Nick Stokes, Edited by Just The Facts with the title: "
Long Satellite Pauses Ending (Now Includes January Data)". The second article was about the February data for UAH (archived
here, latest
here). It had the wistful wishful title: "
Global Temperature Report: Warmest Ever February 2016 driven by El NiƱo". The third article is the real doozy (archived
here). It's by Anthony Watts so could well have some awful blunders in it. He's called his article: "
The ‘Karlization’ of global temperature continues – this time RSS makes a massive upwards adjustment."
This article is a few hours late, and I'm not satisfied that I've got everything right because this is a subject on which I am feeling distinctly out of depth. Science deniers will try to tell you that there are little thermometers on satellites sending raw data to Earth and miraculously drawing temperature charts - or something like that. That's a pile of hogwash. The real story is much more complicated. Satellites come and go. Instruments change. Orbits decay. Temperature isn't measured directly, it's estimated from measurements from microwave sounding instruments (MSUs). What's reported is the result of complex calculations after adjustments and conversion to temperature. What we get are temperature trends in very thick layers in the atmosphere (kilometers thick, looking upwards into space), not the temperature of a particular spot or distinct level in the sky. Then there is "diurnal drift" - which is largely what the
new paper by Carl Mears and Frank J. Wentz is all about.
Warning: this article is rather long. It explains the new RSS paper in more detail than I did in the
previous article.