Have a look! Anthony Watts is trying everything he can think of, no matter how silly, to see if something sticks in his deniers' brains.
Has WUWT hit a new low of denialism? (Of the mundane kind.) |
Global warming and climate change. Eavesdropping on the deniosphere, its weird pseudo-science and crazy conspiracy whoppers.
.
Do you reckon you should even bother to write the article if the answer to the question you pose in your headline is 'no'?
ReplyDelete(See what I did there?)
And CO2 is plant food all right - as any trip through California will currently attest!
Less Stupid deniers, please...
"plants encouraged" - now that is wonderfull! I can see a disconsolate lettuce being cheered up no end. I am a bit puzzled though as to how deniers insist 400ppm is such a low number that it cannot produce a greenhouse effect, while at the same time it is sufficient to boost plant morale.
ReplyDeleteAll climate revisionists deny that CO2 is a GHG, it is that simple.
DeleteUsually in convoluted right wing authorianism talk it reads 'CO2 is of course a GHG with no discernable GHG effect' or moronism like that all meaning the same thing: CO2 is no GHG. That is all.
To those who think 400ppm cannot make a difference, feed about 27 grams of HCN/70 kg of body weight, truly it helps.