.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Latest ENSO report - El Niño is getting stronger

Sou | 11:24 AM Go to the first of 10 comments. Add a comment
The latest ENSO wrap up from the Australian Bureau of Meteorology indicates that the El Niño is likely to continue to strengthen, with trade winds weakened or reversing.

The 2015 El Niño continues to develop. Weakened (or reversed) trade winds have resulted in further warming over much of the tropical Pacific Ocean. All key ENSO ocean monitoring areas have been more than 1°C above average for 10 successive weeks—two weeks longer than the record in 1997. The eastern tropical Pacific is now at or exceeding +2°C. In the atmosphere, the past week has seen the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) drop to around -20, the lowest values of the event so far.

Warning to the bandwidth challenged - one of the files below the fold is rather large (just under 1 MB).

The model outlook from BoM shows the likely strengthening of El Nino, with not that much of a spread between models:



Next an animation of sub-surface temperatures in the equatorial Pacific, down to 400m, starting in January 2014 through to June 2015. This year is different to last year. These are from BoM.



Here's an animation of sea surface temperatures across the Pacific, from NOAA images from January this year through to 20 July:


Below is the latest image of sea surface temperature anomalies in the Pacific, with markups (by me not NOAA). Hot spots are popping up all over:



There's more to impress, from Earth sea surface temperatures and currents. Yellow is hot!







Related HotWhopper articles


10 comments:

  1. Meanwhile, the denialistas party on- ArsTechnica has a comprehensive account of the Heartland Institute's 10th “International Conference on Climate Change,” at

    http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/07/i-rejoice-that-it-is-warm-ars-attends-a-climate-contrarian-conference/

    The author describes it as 'a cathartic echo chamber of outrage.' Sounds much like WUWT.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow. Its unusual to see a denier shindig being so honestly reported.

      Delete
  2. re comment 1: Journalists have a long history of exposing themselves to horrifying events and then writing about them. But this one may take the lot.

    Gag.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The following is potentially within "normal" variability .. however

    The Central Pacific has had three typhoons prior to 17 July this year .. that date is the earliest that ANY typhoon had occurred in any other seasons since the 1950s.

    The North Pacific ACE (Accumulated Cyclone Energy) is 30% higher for this time of year than at any other time since 1971 (when calculations can be started)

    Wind shear, dust and surface pressures over the Atlantic are anomalously high, with relatively cold SSTs, and consequently the Atlantic hurricane season could be significantly curtailed this year, at least for the beginning and middle parts.

    .. we live in interesting times.

    George

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The NCEP discussion stated that the Atlantic season would be less active and that the Pacific season more active as a result of El Nino, so this is not really a surprise, it is part of the usual pattern.

      Delete
    2. The NCEP discussion does cover El Nino impacts. However, in addition to this the Saharan dust loads are notably high (probably associated with a negative AMM). This suggests that the Atlantic season could be at the lower end of the already low expectations. Emphasis on "could".

      Delete
  4. This may be slightly off topic, sorry for that.. Then again, droughts and El Nino may sometimes be linked..

    Anyways, there is a recent publication "Variability and trends in global drought" investigating drought in general - and deniersphere has taken it as an evidence that once again climate science gets it wrong. No increase in droughts as predicted..

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015EA000100/full

    A couple of things nag me here..

    The paper is out this year but uses data up to 2009 - why not up to 2014 (or 2013)?

    Spot check on California: Their results show no change in droughts.. Then again (eye balling only, sorry) noaa indices seem to suggest increase trend in droughts..

    https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/drought/201506#det-reg-spei

    They are using different indices so that could be a natural reason.. But.. Am I over interpreting / misunderstanding this - or is what is going on..?

    Insight / pointers appreciated

    0^0

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've just skimmed the paper. Their definition of %drought is "The percent of the global land area with annual sums of PMPE less than zero". Where PMPE is monthly precipitation (P) minus potential evapotranspiration (PET).

      So while they found no change in total land area under drought, it says nothing about the severity of drought. (Some science points to dry areas getting drier and wet areas getting wetter - so that wouldn't conflict with what this paper found.)

      It also seems to have drought computed by another method that shows it to have increased.

      What the authors are saying is that the increased rain as the world warms, counteracts the increase in evapotranspiration. I don't know how valid that is - or how valuable it is to combine all land areas to get a global average.

      That's the sort of thing that Roger Pielke Jr does to argue that it's not getting any wetter or drier in the USA - even though the east is getting wetter and the west is getting drier. Roger just averages over the lot to make out that nothing's changed. I'm not saying that's all this paper has done though.

      Delete
    2. Thanks.. I was pondering about the size/impact part as well.. Hard to see what could be the real biggie here for the.. Umm.. "others". ;)

      Delete
  5. Total global drought can stay the same whilst local disasters occur with rain falling in the wrong place and the wrong time.

    ReplyDelete

Instead of commenting as "Anonymous", please comment using "Name/URL" and your name, initials or pseudonym or whatever. You can leave the "URL" box blank. This isn't mandatory. You can also sign in using your Google ID, Wordpress ID etc as indicated. NOTE: Some Wordpress users are having trouble signing in. If that's you, try signing in using Name/URL or OpenID. Details here.

Click here to read the HotWhopper comment policy.