.

Sunday, September 21, 2014

WUWT quote of the day from Paul C. "Chip" Knappenberger

Sou | 8:43 PM Go to the first of 11 comments. Add a comment

Seen today. Chip Knappenberger (half of the Pat'n Chip denier duo of the Cato Institute) is quoted in a copy and paste at WUWT:

...there are a lot more cases of non-extreme weather than there are of extreme weather.

Duh!

Ain't that obvious? Nuts for brains!

11 comments:

GSR said...

Chip for brains.

Millicent said...

I have a suggestion for the next academic study of deniers: to evaluate how the apparent IQ of WUWT contributors is dwindling with time.

DavidR said...

I wonder if Chip buys home insurance. There are a lot more cases of houses not burning down than there are of houses burning down. Lot's more houses don't get burgled than get burgled.

Waste of money.

Kevin O'Neill said...

CK's observation doesn't even merit a comment - so I'll ask an off-topic question instead: Has anyone seen a collection of the numerous 'hockey sticks' generated by phenological studies?

I don't mean the subsequent temperature reconstructions to MBH98, but things like the arctic sea ice extent/volume and northern hemisphere lake ice on/off dates. I think it would be instructive and a nice handy reference to have these graphs all telling the same story in one place.

palindrom said...

For a moment I read your comment as saying "phrenological" for "phenological". Took a moment to figure out that you hadn't gone off your rocker!

Catmando said...

And in other news, most bears use forests for bodily functions, most Popes are Catholics, most deniers haven't got a clue.

Kevin O'Neill said...

There's also phenomenology - and for deniers that may be appropriate; they obviously have their own reality.

BBD said...

Kevin O'Neill

I've a notion that I've seen just such a collection of figures, but it was several years ago and of course I can't remember where, nor can I find it now.

Jim Milks provides a good collection of references <a href="http://environmentalforest.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/enough-hockey-sticks-for-team.html>here</a> which will facilitate preparing a gallery of figures. Right now, this is the best I can do although it probably isn't really what you wanted.

BBD said...

Misthreaded *and* a borked link. The usual quality post from BBD.

:-)

...and Then There's Physics said...

Further evidence that the actual pseudo-skeptic strategy is to say things so ridiculous, that noone can bother refuting what is said, and so they can claim to be unrefuted and, therefore, right.

Anonymous said...

There's skullduggery afoot!

Err sorry...

R the anon