It's Easter and I'm taking a day off. Couldn't resist writing about the latest denier conspiracy theory, though. (It will make a nice lead in to an article I'm working on.)
Let me start by asking you a question. If there are five explanations for something happening, which do you think your typical climate science denier will choose?
- the most likely
- the next most likely
- the improbable but possible
- the least likely
- the one that nobody in their right mind would contemplate
- 5. above -- and they'd blame it on a climate scientist.
If you picked the sixth (out of five options), you'd get it right.
