Dear NOAA Folk, and Dr. Mark Eakin:
In the British magazine The Guardian, I noticed the following:
15,000 sq km of coral reef could be lost in current mass bleaching, say scientists
Noaa predicts third-ever global bleaching event could cause a 6% global reduction in coral reefs in less than two years.
A massive coral bleaching event currently ravaging coral reefs across the globe could destroy thousands of square kilometres of coral cover forever, US government scientists have said.
In figures exclusively released to the Guardian, scientists from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) said about 12% of the world’s reefs have suffered bleaching in the last year. Just under half of these, an area of 12,000 sq km of coral, may be lost forever.
Is the Guardian is telling the truth? Is NOAA secretly giving exclusive results to a foreign newspaper before releasing them to the taxpayers who paid for them? The “Coral Reef Watch” section of NOAA is credited with being the ones responsible for this underhanded action. Is this true?
And if so … what on earth are you people thinking of? That would be a blatant misuse of your authority, knowledge and power.
In any case, I call on you to immediately release whatever secret exclusive results the Guardian is referring to. They are using it to alarm the populace WITHOUT ALLOWING US TO INSPECT THE DATA, and you are complicit in their action.
I request that you send me by immediate email a copy of the exact results the article is referring to, and I call on you to publicly declare an end to such underhanded secret release of data. The Guardian is noted for its fire-brand alarmist climate rhetoric. And that’s fine for them, but you, on the other hand, are alleged to be scientists.
So I ask you to act as scientists, to permanently eschew such “exclusively released” figures, and to state publicly that in future your results will be available to all, rather than secretly given to your favored journalists.
My regards to you,
PS—Please be aware that I have raised the issue publicly [with link to this post].
You'll notice a few things. First he took it for granted that he wasn't addressing a woman at the NOAA and didn't write in his normal suave style.
Then you'll notice he called the Guardian a magazine. Perhaps that's all that he knows and he's never heard of a newspaper, which is after all a very old-fashioned concept not suited to the age of the internet.
Thirdly he is a little bit put out that the NOAA would talk to foreigners before checking with him first. After all, he is Wondering Willis Eschenbach of WUWT. Everybody in the United States of America knows they cannot move a muscle without checking first with Willis. Everybody except the "folk" at the NOAA. (Willis likes to play the hillbilly card when he writes to the guvmint. He figures it will win him respect.)
Shouting is a nice touch, too isn't it. It shows that no-one messeth with Wondering Willis and gets away with it.
Now Willis isn't one for doing research himself. He likes to be handed stuff on a platter. And he demands, no requests, that he be served before anyone else. He is top dog in the US of A. Everyone knows that.
And coral reefs are a hot topic at WUWT. There must be an article about them at least once every five years or so.
Me? Well I decided to do some checking. It wasn't hard. Google was my friend. Here, let me show you.
Google kindly led me to NOAA's Coral Reef Watch first of all. There I found the June report, which said that a full-fledged global bleaching event continues to be likely. The secret that the NOAA was so underhandedly secretive about was handed to me immediately. And I didn't even have to ask NOAA. I guess it regards HotWhopper as a foreign friend (my emphasis and paras):
With the seasonal progression of the sun to the northern hemisphere, surface water temperatures in the South Pacific have cooled a bit, bringing relief to South Pacific corals.Here are some maps, more than was shown to the foreigners at the Guardian. The first one is the area having 60% probability of bleaching throughout the world:
A full-fledged global bleaching event continues to be likely.
Warming in the equatorial Indian Ocean has caused bleaching in the British Indian Ocean Territory and the Maldives. Warming also has begun in the Caribbean, with extensive bleaching watches and some warnings present along the southwestern Caribbean coasts.
The declared El Niño continues to build with both Kelvin waves propagating from the west into the eastern Pacific and wind shifts that further strengthen and maintain the El Niño. This El Niño is likely to further exacerbate anomalously warm waters off the U.S. west coast. Coral Reef Watch (CRW) continues to expect another global-scale bleaching in 2015 but hopefully not as severe as the 2010 event. However, some locations may suffer worse bleaching this year than in the past, just as we saw record thermal stress in the northernmost Mariana Islands and the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands in 2014. Our greatest current concern is the upcoming Caribbean bleaching season, although some unusual developments are appearing in the Four-Month Coral Bleaching Thermal Stress Outlook, including the potential of bleaching again this year in Hawai'i.
The next one is the area having 90% probability of bleaching throughout the world:
The next one is the area of the Pacific with 60% probability of coral bleaching:
Huge areas are at risk. If you want more detail you can go to the charts on this NOAA page. (That is, if you're a foreigner. It's probably not available to US citizens like Wondering Willis.)
If you are a US citizen, you may have to put up with just reading the latest news release from NOAA, which came out on 6 July. Here is part of what it said:
As unusually warm ocean temperatures cover the north Pacific, equatorial Pacific, and western Atlantic oceans, NOAA scientists expect greater bleaching of corals on Northern Hemisphere reefs through October, potentially leading to the death of corals over a wide area and affecting the long-term supply of fish and shellfish.You can read the rest here on the NOAA website.
While corals can recover from mild bleaching, severe or long-term bleaching kills corals. Even if corals recover, they are more susceptible to disease. Once corals die, it usually takes decades for the reef to recover -- but recovery is only possible if the reefs are undisturbed. After corals die, reefs degrade and the structures corals build are eroded away, providing less shoreline protection and less habitat for fish and shellfish.
“The bleaching that started in June 2014 has been really bad for corals in the western Pacific,” said Mark Eakin, NOAA Coral Reef Watch coordinator. “We are worried that bleaching will spread to the western Atlantic and again into Hawaii.”
What is the secret information, you are probably asking if you've got this far. Well, it's this:
In figures exclusively released to the Guardian, scientists from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa) said about 12% of the world’s reefs have suffered bleaching in the last year. Just under half of these, an area of 12,000 sq km of coral, may be lost forever.Two numbers: 12% and 12,000 sq km. That's what Wondering Willis is a little bit upset over. He was offended that when Karl Mathiesen got the NOAA press release he didn't just print it verbatim, he acted like a journalist and got in touch with Mark Eakin, the NOAA Coral Reef Watch Coordinator, and obtained more information. He also had the gall to get in touch with Professor Ove Hoegh-Guldberg of Australia, without consulting yours truly. (That part didn't offend Willis' sensitive sensibilities. After all, he's just another foreigner of no consequence.)
You can learn a bit about coral bleaching from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority website.
Thing is, that coral bleaching has been in the news rather a lot lately, though you'd never know that if you only read articles at WUWT. Perhaps that's the reason why Willis is wondering how he missed out on reading about it.
Winning friends and influencing people
The point of all this as you will well know is - Willis is wanting to win friends and influence people. The friends aren't the NOAA, it's the conspiracy theorising rabble at WUWT that Willis is keen to win and influence. Notice the trigger words and phrases, enough to boil the blood of any rednecked American conspiracy theorist:
- British magazine The Guardian (a commie rag in the minds of WUWT-ers)
- Is the Guardian is telling the truth?
- secretly giving exclusive results
- foreign newspaper
- taxpayers who paid for them (never mind that US (denier) taxpayers felt quite entitled to demand data from foreign scientists)
- blatant misuse of your authority, knowledge and power.
- underhanded action
- secret exclusive results
- using it to alarm the populace
- WITHOUT ALLOWING US TO INSPECT THE DATA
Then the obsequious "my regards to you" followed by the earth-shattering threat that must have left NOAA shaking in its multiple boots (or flippers, given the setting) - not!
From the WUWT comments
The only source of news for sabretruthtiger must be WUWT. Everything else is "alarmist propaganda". Otherwise he'd surely have seen all the news articles of the past few weeks, even if he missed the 6 July news release from NOAA:
July 7, 2015 at 8:05 pmcharles nelson knows that you can't trust the Guardian:
Wow they’ve really streamlined the alarmist propaganda pipeline, they now bypass all other media outlets and go straight to the Communist Chairman of lefty lie rags ‘the Guardian’.
July 7, 2015 at 8:07 pm
Is the Guardian telling the truth?
The Guardian wouldn’t recognise ‘the truth’ if if came up and bit them on the arse!
It’s hilarious…they STILL can’t bring themselves to admit that they were wrong about the Euro!
Claude Harvey is worried that Willis might lose his lips:
July 7, 2015 at 8:24 pm
Members of the Executive Branch of our federal government no longer consider themselves “servants of the people”. Better guard that lip, Willis. Antagonizing your masters is rift with onerous consequences. With AGW having been declared “a national security issue”, lose lips could sink ships (of State).
Half Tide Rock can't resist a bit of conspiratorial thinking:
July 7, 2015 at 8:25 pm
The highest court in my State has ruled that (to put it politely) misrepresentation is acceptable exercise of free speech in politics. I am thinking that it is equally possible that the Guardian just made the NOAA release up. These people are ideologues, they know that the truth in politics is what the people believe and has no necessary linkage to reality. That game plan is why these people are so creative and effective..
Gary piles on with the same conspiracy:
July 7, 2015 at 8:47 pm
The Guardian claims it got exclusive data from NOAA, but given its history of miniscule acquaintance with the truth, how do you know IT isn’t making this up too? I hope you sent a similar letter to the Guardian asking for clarification.
Further reading from HotWhopper
- Wondering Willis as a concerned climate scientist (showing his sexism) - August 2013 (another infamous letter from Willis Eschenbach)
- Anthony Watts and Andrew Bolt want "Lights out for the Great Barrier Reef" - March 2014
- Perennially Puzzled Bob Tisdale surfs the surface at Florida Keys - September 2014