tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post7631830373039776040..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Another (recycled) cacophony from Anthony Watts. No, it's NOT the sun stupid!Souhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-90912608890306786572013-12-30T05:50:18.242+11:002013-12-30T05:50:18.242+11:00Anthony Watts is in the middle of a tweet frenzy. ...Anthony Watts is in the middle of a tweet frenzy. He's been tweeting madly to all and sundry. At one stage he asked a University of Victoria scientist from BC something about Australian taxpayers! (He's mixed up Victoria BC with Victoria Australia before, but there was absolutely no excuse this time around. The twitter profile and the scientist's home page are as clear as can be about who he is and where he works. Canada is writ in large letters all over.) <br /><br />Then Anthony started flinging insults at random to anyone he happened to come across, whether they included him in a tweet or not. At the same time he complained about being insulted.<br /><br />As part of his tweet mania Anthony also tweeted Gavin Schmidt, saying his headline (as shown above) was "political humour" and suggesting climate scientists should get a sense of humour! This after spending much time calling Gavin "cowardly" in this very same article. <br /><br />Is Anthony's constant denial of reality when it comes to climate science making him lose his grip on reality altogether I wonder?Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-2146865854148140132013-12-29T22:44:41.858+11:002013-12-29T22:44:41.858+11:00I know it's not relevant necessarily to this p...I know it's not relevant necessarily to this post (and since I've been dissecting Monckton's latest drivel on morality) I note this quote from a comment on his own post, in response to a non-denier called Warren:<br /><br />"Talking of which, “Warren” says 99.8% of scientific papers “support” anthropogenic global warming. Well, I support it myself."<br /><br />So, Monckton supports anthropogenic global warming. Could have fooled me. Actually, he did. And I think he fooled most of the people who take even the slightest notice of him. His comment is archived in this http://archive.is/37Ruh. It's a long way down.Catmandohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12313870265499015076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-54312204755329956462013-12-29T22:44:27.031+11:002013-12-29T22:44:27.031+11:00"if the earth cooled down in the next two dec..."if the earth cooled down in the next two decades I've no doubt they would be able to explain what caused it."<br /><br />A cooling earth would be consistent with global warming!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com