tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post7597993676762799055..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Dumb as: Anthony Watts complains Hausfather17 authors didn't use FUTURE dataSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger30125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-49398761949578168042017-01-14T08:13:20.250+11:002017-01-14T08:13:20.250+11:00>> Watts is complaining about the paper not ...>> Watts is complaining about the paper not <br />>> using data that didn't come out until months <br />>> after the paper was completed?<br /><br />No, no - he was complaining about the missing data that was not only not available, but that if it had been available would have strengthened the "warmist" conclusions of the authors.<br /><br />There is only one possibility -- Anthony Watts is a shill for a giant secret Alarmist Conspiracy. Urgently need to look for funding links between WUWT and the dreaded IPCC.Frank Pennycookhttp://pennycook.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-42285443683675473092017-01-09T09:20:59.433+11:002017-01-09T09:20:59.433+11:00This is really crazy. I have used my response to t...This is really crazy. I have used my response to the Hausfather article to patiently explain again why there is no such a thing as a pause and never was.<br /><a href="http://variable-variability.blogspot.de/2017/01/much-ado-about-noaathing.html" rel="nofollow">Much ado about NOAAthing</a>Victor Venemahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02842816166712285801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-35435486029573881542017-01-08T12:24:58.421+11:002017-01-08T12:24:58.421+11:00Even worse, he complained that they didn't use...Even worse, he complained that they didn't use data that isn't available yet (December 2016 data for ERSST, HadSST and probably COBE-SST won't come out till later this month.)Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-64866541395500230922017-01-08T09:55:03.415+11:002017-01-08T09:55:03.415+11:00Geez. Watts is complaining about the paper not us...Geez. Watts is complaining about the paper not using data that didn't come out until months after the paper was completed? How sad do these guys need to get?Raynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-46105821925370967482017-01-08T02:03:23.158+11:002017-01-08T02:03:23.158+11:00AW writes: "...I contend that the data should...AW writes: "...<i>I contend that the data should be updated in the paper before publishing it. A year long gap, with a significant cooling taking place, is bound to change the results."</i><br /><br />As Nick Stokes pointed out, yes it does change the trend -- it increases it. As Mosher pointed out, a crystal ball would have been necessary to include 2016 data given the paper was submitted in March of 2016.<br /><br />No one bothered to point out the hypocrisy of the whole up-to-date data complaint coming from AW. His 2015 AGU poster had data thru - wait for it -- 2008! LMAO :)Kevin O'Neillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15751040367339659805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-27411881091272825752017-01-07T16:01:27.903+11:002017-01-07T16:01:27.903+11:00No warming since last Wednesday!No warming since last Wednesday!MWSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-88357864212995891052017-01-06T19:50:29.719+11:002017-01-06T19:50:29.719+11:00Yes Nick - but it's all the EN's fault you...Yes Nick - but it's all the EN's fault you see.<br />Seen from their perspective of the "pause", it's that damned EN wot did it, and well, it's cooling now innit, stands to reason.<br />They are desperately hanging on to "Monckton's pause" for dear life and the concept of a long-term trend doesn't scan (as if anything sensible does).<br />I once posted up a WFT's graph showing that the "pause" was actually a step-up that would not cross the long term trend from prior 1997 until 2025 .... but no, anything that happened before that Nino didn't count.Tony Bantonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12255065592950357838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-3124897366850766562017-01-06T10:09:08.069+11:002017-01-06T10:09:08.069+11:00Flats earthers have an easier time tbh (quite a re...Flats earthers have an easier time tbh (quite a resurgence on the www atm )<br /><br />At least the earth looks flat <br /><br />All the temp graphs on WUWT go up, and arctic sea ice extent go down<br /><br />TadaaaTadaaahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07736188830660481871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-83758051347366404162017-01-06T05:26:21.140+11:002017-01-06T05:26:21.140+11:00It's even dumber: Watts is claiming the record...It's even dumber: Watts is claiming the record hottest year itself demonstrates global cooling!numerobisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-14815411710118897692017-01-06T04:02:43.748+11:002017-01-06T04:02:43.748+11:00Excellent article. Makes it clear everyone except ...Excellent article. Makes it clear everyone except Republicans and WUWT denizens (i.e. the 'ideologically challenged') that the rate of warming hasn't changed in decades. And... the adjustments NOAA have been making were valid all along.metzomagichttp://metzomagic.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-74102244475600675432017-01-06T03:15:16.075+11:002017-01-06T03:15:16.075+11:00No warming since 2017!No warming since 2017!PG_Antiochnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-5155401399544457192017-01-06T03:08:03.229+11:002017-01-06T03:08:03.229+11:00No warming since 2017!No warming since 2017!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-71850188057395883112017-01-05T22:39:34.999+11:002017-01-05T22:39:34.999+11:00But, but, haven't we seen WUWT docking off the...But, but, haven't we seen WUWT docking off the recent upsurge in temperatures on numerous graphs of their own making?Millicentnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-30777332437417545912017-01-05T21:28:54.528+11:002017-01-05T21:28:54.528+11:00the whutters seem genuinely amazed that the scienc...the whutters seem genuinely amazed that the science moves forward<br /><br />better data, better analysis techniques, better technology, better understanding<br /><br /> Tadaaahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07736188830660481871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-38421719521320148862017-01-05T20:00:02.420+11:002017-01-05T20:00:02.420+11:00Yes, there's a lot of hand-waving "it'...Yes, there's a lot of hand-waving "it's wrong" comments, but the most hypocritical are the "can't trust them, they've altered it" ones.<br />They just don't get the fact that when I comment it is, purely and simply, in support of the science. They reflexively think I'm a "Warmunist" - because their motivation comes from the ideology of the right-wing.<br />Never occurs to them that someone should just advocate the science for it's own sake. Motiveless save for the blindingly obvious fact that it works and in the case of CO2, for around 150 years.<br />The hypocrisy I talk of is the singling out of UAH as the "Gold standard" because the surface record is "altered". Point out the "altered" record of that and RSS, and they have no answer of course. Doesn't stop them finding one and blustering about it.<br />There's a thread where I had a go with Bill Illis re that and the fact that that there is a disconnect from '98 on the MSU to AMSU changeover and you get the "radiosondes are wrong" type reply (actually Watts replied to me with that type of response on another thread) .... completely missing the illogic of thousands of sondes going "wrong" at the point that ONE sensor was changed !!Tony Bantonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12255065592950357838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-85611321016106651602017-01-05T18:32:07.967+11:002017-01-05T18:32:07.967+11:00it has hit the BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/scie...it has hit the BBC<br /><br />http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38513740Tadaaahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07736188830660481871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-39577480765042259622017-01-05T15:55:59.845+11:002017-01-05T15:55:59.845+11:00The irony is that including 2016 data greatly incr...The irony is that including 2016 data greatly <i>increases</i> the trend, because the new data, although down from the peak, is still way above the trend line, and so raises it. I posted there a table pf trends from a favorite pause start, June 1997 (units °C/century)<br /><br />dataset________End 12/15___End 11/16<br />NOAA SST_______1.099_______1.316<br />HADSST3________0.763_______1.026<br /><br />Nick Stokeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06377413236983002873noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-52494670103840119762017-01-05T15:33:09.901+11:002017-01-05T15:33:09.901+11:00To be clear, when I say that "[c]limate chang...To be clear, when I say that "[c]limate change denialism supports...", I mean that it provides evidence to support...Bernard J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16299073166371273808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-53978138505819552532017-01-05T14:50:12.973+11:002017-01-05T14:50:12.973+11:00Climate change denialism supports the proposition ...Climate change denialism supports the proposition that there is one way of being right, and countless ways of being wrong.Bernard J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16299073166371273808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-25739678140366785862017-01-05T14:19:03.096+11:002017-01-05T14:19:03.096+11:00Sou its just like those old PSI tests with the gue...Sou its just like those old PSI tests with the guessing of cards with the five symbols. Just by chance you should get 20% correct. If you got none correct then you must be psychic! Bert<br />Bert from Elthamnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-10555645329900500102017-01-05T13:56:17.321+11:002017-01-05T13:56:17.321+11:00type of people who follow WUWT repeat the same sel...<i>type of people who follow WUWT repeat the same self reinforcing monologue time and time again.</i><br /><br />The Bible has some choice words for those clowns: Proverbs 26:11caerbannoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03896552738444745753noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-75833885682219917942017-01-05T12:49:13.310+11:002017-01-05T12:49:13.310+11:00Any one with functioning logic circuits would find...Any one with functioning logic circuits would find reading WUWT for an hour or so a confirmation of climate change science. <br />The amount of gibberingly stupid logical contortions they need to do to refute the science shows one the intellectual bankruptcy of their position .<br /> Even with very little education in science the illogical dribble I read at WUWT was enough to convince me they had to be <br /><br /> "Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!" <br />That is not only not right, it is not even wrong<br />Wolfgang Pauli,Griffnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-83644871729523532132017-01-05T12:24:30.172+11:002017-01-05T12:24:30.172+11:00Sou.
That is what I think too. They are well-trai...Sou.<br /><br />That is what I think too. They are well-trained "useful idiots".<br /><br />I always have a giggle when these type of blogs go around asking for donations. They are basically asking the people they have been conning to pay for the conning.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11872802685104293884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-18665255686911338142017-01-05T11:59:51.274+11:002017-01-05T11:59:51.274+11:00That is exactly what I see, John. For many of Anth...That is exactly what I see, John. For many of Anthony Watts' fans, it doesn't even matter what the topic of the article is - they'll post similar comments no matter the subject. A knee jerk reaction against knowledge (they despise it).Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-76341639390130357162017-01-05T11:57:48.125+11:002017-01-05T11:57:48.125+11:00I'm thinking there must be a denier school tea...I'm thinking there must be a denier school teaching people how to be crazy. Surely no-one could be as stupid as Anthony Watts and his fans, without a bit of training. It's "not natural". Must be anthropogenic :DSouhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.com