tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post5299055063611658904..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: How deluded is Anthony Watts? Let us count the ways...Souhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-39461107989245314642016-03-14T00:15:54.185+11:002016-03-14T00:15:54.185+11:00Be honest Sou and confess your sin....
Evil beli...Be honest Sou and confess your sin....<br /><br /><br />Evil believers in reality stealthily sabotaged wee willard's poll by each voting #eleventy times<br /><br />CONSPIRACY11!!!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07604184699513441116noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-36178810450751609732016-03-13T23:57:16.310+11:002016-03-13T23:57:16.310+11:00Since willard et trolls dwell in their own person...Since willard et trolls dwell in their own personal wingnut alternate reality it is no surprise that there is 97% concensus in that one too.<br /> #wutz #DMIgate #snipgateAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07604184699513441116noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-62419603266777037402013-12-08T21:05:21.081+11:002013-12-08T21:05:21.081+11:00The winged monkeys ain't getting any brighter!...The winged monkeys ain't getting any brighter!...billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-70963340229777529422013-12-08T19:42:57.910+11:002013-12-08T19:42:57.910+11:00You're hardly the only warmist who makes silly...<i>You're hardly the only warmist who makes silly blog posts every time Watts does.</i><br /><br />I think what you meant was <i>You're hardly the only warmist who makes blog posts every time Watts makes a silly blog post.</i><br /><br />Wotts kept up with the Anthony's silly blog posts fairly well. Others do so less often.<br /><br />BTW, you don't understand what a strawman is. <br /><br />I re-read your comment up the top. You are arguing that people who accept science might be reading WUWT in the drones but never comment there or take part in any way. There is no way of knowing that, but if it's the case, you've got to ask why that would be. Is it:<br /><br />a) They don't read WUWT and many have never heard of it. Why would they want to read anti-science tripe?<br /><br />b) They do visit all the time, but Anthony's banned the lot of them from commenting and answering polls.<br /><br />c) They do read it all the time, and they are remarkably restrained. Which is not how climate hawks are portrayed by the denialati. One of the constant refrains from fake sceptics is how their plaintive voices are drowned out by those who promote science over anti-science.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-46371905219846516452013-12-08T18:45:50.084+11:002013-12-08T18:45:50.084+11:00Seriously, Google 'Watts up' and Wotts up&...Seriously, Google 'Watts up' and Wotts up'. You're hardly the only warmist who makes silly blog posts every time Watts does. Then actually read what I wrote and drop the Strawmen. Schitzreehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17311863873634513259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-58451695562004131882013-12-07T11:23:35.653+11:002013-12-07T11:23:35.653+11:00Hmm. So you've read posts by a whole 22 peopl...Hmm. So you've read posts by a whole 22 people who accept climate science. Plus what, you reckon four or five other people might read it occasionally? And how many years have you been a WUWT regular? You reckon you agree with Anthony that must mean there are as big a percentage of "alarmists" at WUWT as deniers?<br /><br />You'd never have read 22 different "alarmists" post comments on the same day, that's for sure. The max allowed on any one day is about three. <br /><br />No-one ever accused deniers of having an appreciation of scale or relativity or being able to do simple arithmetic. No-one ever accused deniers of not being deluded either.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-54261574909595656672013-12-07T11:15:21.423+11:002013-12-07T11:15:21.423+11:00Aha! So there is only me plus maybe a fraction of ...Aha! So there is only me plus maybe a fraction of one fake sceptic who reads WUWT? He or she must be a very good sock puppet able to adopt a zillion different personas. Worth their weight in gold (not fiat money printed by the guvmint)!<br /><br />Anthony Watts would be offended to think he is regarded so lowly by his two sole fans (who if their arithmetic is right, rarely go to WUWT) :(<br /><br />(No-one I've asked in real life has heard of WUWT or Anthony Watts.)Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-67631883936803941392013-12-07T09:21:27.250+11:002013-12-07T09:21:27.250+11:00Well if you were to count time spent on WUWT by me...Well if you were to count time spent on WUWT by members of both sides of the debate, the alarmists are sure to come out on top, especially considering how much time you alone spend there.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-46872732596243503082013-12-07T08:59:49.524+11:002013-12-07T08:59:49.524+11:00Well, that's certainly an interesting bit of a...Well, that's certainly an interesting bit of accounting. for the sake of avoiding any 'Conspiracy Ideation' I won't do more than point out that not all of the CAGW faithful may have voted in the survey that proved Lew's paper was bull.<br />Instead, let's look at the numbers. Only 22 voters claimed to be True Believers. Are we supposed to believe that's all the Faithful that reads WUWT? I've read posts there by more Warmists then that. Heck, WUWT's own solar expert is himself a warmist ( and seems to enjoy shooting down any sceptical solar forcing theory). Or what about all the darlings of the climate world? The High Priests like Mann? The Glieck's? The Rom's? The Lew's and the Cook's? We know they read WUWT regularly just from how often they blog or bleet or twitter about what is said there. Are THEY all counted in that survey? <br />What about YOU, Sou? You apperantly read WUWT every day. You probably read it more then I do. Are you part of the 22? How many Sou's do think might be out there by now, reading WUWT every day, every POST? And clearly hating every minute of it.<br />I don't know how many might be out there, but off the top of my head I can think of half a dozen that blog about their misery regularly. Schitzreehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17311863873634513259noreply@blogger.com