tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post5137292544678945203..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: About that 97% - Not a "Great Moment" for WUWTSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-28500611634962279232013-06-08T08:36:07.072+10:002013-06-08T08:36:07.072+10:00More fruitcake to go with my cuppa tea. Yummy agai...More <a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/05/todays-menu-from-anthony-watts.html" rel="nofollow">fruitcake </a>to go with my <a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/06/about-pdo-lags-kettles-cycles-and.html" rel="nofollow">cuppa tea</a>. Yummy again.<br /><br />Oh, did you hear that one about <a href="http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Oregon_Petition" rel="nofollow">the Oregon Petition</a>? And this might help <a href="http://www.mathfoundation.com/" rel="nofollow">your affliction</a>. So might <a href="http://www.rocketreader.com/benefits/slow.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> and <a href="http://www.cambridge-elearning.com/critical_thinking.html" rel="nofollow">this</a>.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-75681652767841041362013-06-08T07:50:45.659+10:002013-06-08T07:50:45.659+10:0097% ?
31,000+ scientists signed the Oregon Petitio...97% ?<br />31,000+ scientists signed the Oregon Petition vs. ~70 hardcore delusional fanatics behind AGW =<br />0.22% - that's 1 in 450 - of scientists buying into AGW, a 450 to 1 majority of scientists who DON'T.<br /><br />And in any case the "scientists" who do are really neofascist politicians, not scientists. That would seem to be an infinite, unanmious consensus among REAL scientists, as opposed to wacko counterhuman politicians, that global warming ain't happening. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-50099651148321988332013-05-21T14:54:31.682+10:002013-05-21T14:54:31.682+10:00Yummy - more fruitcake!Yummy - <a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/05/todays-menu-from-anthony-watts.html" rel="nofollow">more fruitcake!</a>Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-37599702358122321102013-05-21T14:44:52.383+10:002013-05-21T14:44:52.383+10:00"Causation does not mean correlation period&q..."Causation does not mean correlation period" <br /><br />You have that back to front - it is "Correlation does not imply causation".<br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation<br /><br />"the mountain in Peru are melting… blame it on global warming. The glaciers in Europe are melting.. blame it on global warming. "<br /><br />Yes - temperatures rise, ice melts. Do you have some alternative physics?<br /><br />On this albeit small sample size, I would also have to take issue with the claim "We skeptics are intelligent people..."<br />MikeHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-7143634262756091262013-05-21T14:08:33.499+10:002013-05-21T14:08:33.499+10:00We skeptics are intelligent people who question th...We skeptics are intelligent people who question the canard of global warming. Remember when scientist believed in the ether. Or more closer to home, the cooling of planet during the seventies and the dire warning of the impending disaster of a frozen planet plagued with starvation. <br />All I see is a group of scientist who have a political agenda and try to fit the data to their beliefs. If they want to get money from the Washington funding trough, they have to follow the religion of their peers. Examples, the ocean reefs are dying.. blame it on global warming… the mountain in Peru are melting… blame it on global warming. The glaciers in Europe are melting.. blame it on global warming. Causation does not mean correlation period. Let’s call this priesthood what it really is… the vast ecoclimate complex. If you believe you get money, if you don’t you starve. <br />Now with have10 years of cooling and the modeling – a – teers cannot figure why the models arent working. Maybe the initial premise is wrong. (Hey don’t believe the data… global warming is out there just wait… its coming soooooooooooon ) <br />Skeptic? you bet. We have a whole new generation that has been fed this garbage instead of training them to think analytically. No wonder why we will falter from our position in the world. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-88880404684764206912013-05-19T21:08:48.208+10:002013-05-19T21:08:48.208+10:00Would be fun to break them down into categories:
...Would be fun to break them down into categories:<br /><br />Paranoid conspiracy theorists (general)<br /><br />Climate hoax conspiracy theorists<br /><br />Ice age alarmists<br /><br />Thunderstorm warmists<br /><br />Jumping ENSO warmists<br /><br />It's natural therefore we can't do anything alarmists<br /><br />CO2 has no effect on temperature (Is that what Don Easterbrook<a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/05/18/how-the-ipcc-arrived-at-climate-sensitivity-of-about-3-deg-c-instead-of-1-2-deg-c/#comment-1308941" rel="nofollow"> is now saying</a>?)Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-14640880625206701822013-05-18T21:50:36.655+10:002013-05-18T21:50:36.655+10:0098% of willards readers reject science. What a sh...98% of willards readers reject science. What a shock.Iggynimbusnoreply@blogger.com