tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post5057528644423134188..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: The Wrong Climate StuffSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-43454806934874584862015-03-24T15:51:27.986+11:002015-03-24T15:51:27.986+11:00On a gutful of brainless :)On <a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/01/hotwhopper-of-week-gutful-of-brainless.html" rel="nofollow">a gutful of brainless</a> :)Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-45003579316374167452015-03-24T15:24:15.695+11:002015-03-24T15:24:15.695+11:00Better the absence of gut than brain...Better the absence of gut than brain...billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-51763571949357808932015-03-24T15:16:23.421+11:002015-03-24T15:16:23.421+11:00Bob, you are so... what is the word?
Brainless.Bob, you are so... what is the word?<br /><br />Brainless.Bernard J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16299073166371273808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-74414769263038083532015-03-24T13:15:52.096+11:002015-03-24T13:15:52.096+11:00Sou, you are so... what is the word? Gutless.Sou, you are so... what is the word? Gutless.Bobnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-8656345214464237512015-03-14T02:07:17.398+11:002015-03-14T02:07:17.398+11:00Bob's comments have been reposted by Sou at th...<i>Bob's comments have been reposted by Sou at the <a href="http://hotwhopper.com/HotWhoppery.html#http://hotwhopper.com/HotWhoppery.html" rel="nofollow">the HotWhoppery</a></i>Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-53446610067102499082015-03-14T01:13:57.273+11:002015-03-14T01:13:57.273+11:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Bobnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-2472752338196769362013-04-29T10:20:57.926+10:002013-04-29T10:20:57.926+10:00Klem says a 69 page report including nine pages of...Klem <a href="http://climatecommission.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/The-Critical-Decade_July-revision_Low-res.pdf" rel="nofollow">says a 69 page report including nine pages of references</a> is full of "unsupportable" assumptions, and yet by contrast he also thinks it's full of "infallible" assumptions. For most people that would be enough evidence to confirm that <a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/03/fooling-bottom-8-oh-its-just-another.html#RWA" rel="nofollow"> this hat fits him</a> very well indeed.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-60834892471717632842013-04-29T00:50:41.184+10:002013-04-29T00:50:41.184+10:00I wonder if anonymous is referring to me or the Cl...I wonder if anonymous is referring to me or the Climate Commission when conferring infallibility :DSouhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-82932720996259086822013-04-28T22:03:54.702+10:002013-04-28T22:03:54.702+10:00Wow I read some your links, they are full of unsup...Wow I read some your links, they are full of unsupportable and infallible assumptions. Do Australians actually pay for this?<br /><br />It 's delusional. Lol!<br /><br />klemAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-51211452247876746242013-04-26T22:08:54.268+10:002013-04-26T22:08:54.268+10:00Have you indeed, Klem. And have you listened? Di...Have you indeed, Klem. And have you listened? Did you follow the link to find out why this is the critical decade? Do you know how much of our <a href="http://www.carbontracker.org/carbonbubble" rel="nofollow">carbon budget</a> we've already spent?<br /><br />I say you are <a href="http://climatecommission.gov.au/the-critical-decade-key-messages/" rel="nofollow">demonstrably wrong</a> - on <a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/p/about-us.html" rel="nofollow">all counts</a>. Makes me wonder if <a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/03/fooling-bottom-8-oh-its-just-another.html#RWA" rel="nofollow">this hat</a> might fit you rather well.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-74966012082638236262013-04-26T21:48:58.275+10:002013-04-26T21:48:58.275+10:00"Me? I'll go with the 97%. This is the C..."Me? I'll go with the 97%. This is the Critical Decade."<br /><br />Haha! We've been hearing that line from the greenie alarmists for 20 years now. Which decade is the critical decade, was it the last decade? No. Will be this decade? Probably not. Perhaps it will the next decade, yea that will be the critical decade. Yea right.<br /><br />By the time the so called critical decade actually happens, you'll be an old man, and by then you'll be a climate denier! Lol!<br /><br />klemAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-7690178684036475312013-04-23T13:20:05.364+10:002013-04-23T13:20:05.364+10:00Well-spotted, KAP. They aren't paleoclimatolo...Well-spotted, KAP. They aren't paleoclimatologists or geologists, they're engineers. They didn't do as badly as Don though. Unlike Don they don't try to tell you that Greenland = global. (Prob it's the 'correctness' of some of their report that's stopping it from getting much promotion in denier circles).<br /><br />It's a weird report, jumping from one fake skeptic talking point to another (getting some of them right, in contrast to their denier sources) rather than taking a more holistic view of climate change. They don't want to face facts in their entirety so they cherry pick from denier blogs of Curry and Spencer, mixed with a dash of Christy. Pretending that 'uncertainty' means 'don't know' - seemingly unaware that the amount of uncertainty can be quantified. <br /><br />Looking at the blogs and people they rely on (as well as what they say directly) exposes their 'reasoning' and motivation as political not scientific. With more than a whiff of Heartland but less of the stench of Heartland.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-19279940712209340652013-04-23T06:02:14.404+10:002013-04-23T06:02:14.404+10:00Just FYI, I sent an email to the webmaster of Righ...Just FYI, I sent an email to the webmaster of Right Climate Stuff on Friday the 19th, pointing out an obvious error in their report (they apparently recycled Don Easterbrook's chart of Richard Alley's GISP2 temperatures, which erroneously shifts the "Present" convention from 1950 to 2000 AD).<br /><br />So far, no response. If I get one, I'll let you know.KAPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11189506171267750391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-80942012338066949532013-04-23T01:30:06.226+10:002013-04-23T01:30:06.226+10:00Great minds, eh! Yes, I too find such double stan...Great minds, eh! Yes, I too find such double standards perplexing to say the least.<br /><br />IMO business is quite a way ahead of government on the renewables front. Still need to bring governments along if we're to deal with this mess in time.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-29162037598807713762013-04-23T01:23:32.224+10:002013-04-23T01:23:32.224+10:00Yes, I wrote about this myself today. What I foun...Yes, I wrote about this myself today. What I found most interesting was one of the comments in the report suggesting that the government should not interfere in the development of alternative energy technologies. It should be left to the free market. Rather ironic coming from a group of people who worked for one of the biggest publicly funded scientific projects in history. One that would almost certainly not have happened had it been left to market forces.Wotts Up With That Bloghttp://wottsupwiththatblog.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.com