tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post467223973213823259..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: HotWhopper of the Week: Feminism is a Lysenko plotSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-46197904370034707112015-02-12T22:08:32.826+11:002015-02-12T22:08:32.826+11:00Never the less feminist pseudo-science is compable...Never the less feminist pseudo-science is compable to Soviet era Lysenkian genetics. Nut cases in the same shell. Coweatsmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18227735015904376910noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-58091617616855671682013-03-29T06:14:12.188+11:002013-03-29T06:14:12.188+11:00Who reads this shit? And more worrying, who actual...Who reads this shit? And more worrying, who actually believes your shit? I see a twisted, jilted member drivelling on and on about something most would build a bridge and get over it...LOL <br /><br />And all this drivel on climate change??? Did you know Perth had its wettest Marxh in 42 years. Shock, horror and deceiving. It rains for one day for whatever mms and it's sensational drivel. Now, if it rained for a week, even for the same rain content, then a claim could be staked. But, as attributed to, shock, horror, climate change...LOL <br /><br />Get a life MobyT. Have you got a good fella looking after you? You sound jilted. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-22079770903273990122013-03-01T16:51:03.920+11:002013-03-01T16:51:03.920+11:00Cliff, that looks like a warped rationalisation of...Cliff, that looks like a warped rationalisation of selfishness, doesn't it :(<br /><br />You might be interested in this recent paper by <a href="http://www.shapingtomorrowsworld.org/Lewandowsky_2013_Recursive_Fury.pdf" rel="nofollow">Lewandowsky et al, Recursive Fury</a>, particularly towards the end where they refer to 'echo chambers'. <br /><br />IMO HC is a terrific example of an 'echo chamber' and constructed that way from the top down (management, moderator selection etc).<br /><br />Elsewhere in the paper there is discussion of how conspiracy theorists ascribe 'evil intent' eg in your example, charities are 'evil' (greedy, inefficient etc) therefore I won't donate.<br /><br />Same with their attitudes towards women (women are trying to rise above their 'true' station in life and constitute a threat to men). <br /><br />These people operate 'safely' within HC's 'echo chamber', providing mutual support for each other.<br /><br />I might write more about conspiracy ideation in the context of climate science denial (and maybe sexism as well) - there's heaps of material to draw on (not just HC but elsewhere on the internet as well).MobyThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15006309725007945038noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-24186663872699469012013-03-01T15:02:05.954+11:002013-03-01T15:02:05.954+11:00It may be be Anti Science and Anti women but Hotw...It may be be Anti Science and Anti women but Hotwhopper is alwways benevolant.<br /><br />It is such a compassionate society. Always discussing the plights of the less fortunate. Never whinging greedily and incessantly about themselves. <br /><br />I can’t find the thread but I will summarize if I may. Some uninitiated, innocent stumbled across the general forum and made a post about UNICEF or World Vision and how he donated. He wanted peoples thoughts about them. Well all hell broke loose from the redneck brigade as these organisations were pilloried as being cash grabbing, wealth re-distributing, inefficient greedy organisations. All the excuses which would of course absolve an individual for not donating.<br /><br />This left the original poster, who was perhaps seeking deserving praise, almost shameful for his charitable nature.<br /><br />It is hard to imagine how so many unselfish and charitable folk found each other.<br /> Cliffnoreply@blogger.com