tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post4602961363855097947..comments2024-02-12T15:25:44.028+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Jim Steele, greenhouse effect denier, gets up to his tricks in the ArcticSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-69380378909951442942014-11-04T15:49:08.507+11:002014-11-04T15:49:08.507+11:00You guys *way* overestimate the mental abilities o...You guys *way* overestimate the mental abilities of 9 year olds...Cesiumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02025636403503365433noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-3204844339591589042014-10-22T04:23:54.421+11:002014-10-22T04:23:54.421+11:00Steele loves the words "straw man." He ...Steele loves the words "straw man." He uses them in every post. He also never, ever, ever provides the original graphics in his rants. He always doctors them. I have asked him several times to provide me links to his peer-reviewed science papers, but he always changes the subject. Then his fellow trolls come on line and say that he can't get published because of the "science conspirators." I have even asked to see the papers he's provided to the journals, even if they're not published. Total crickets.CMSnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-34680352116725609692014-06-21T13:07:13.777+10:002014-06-21T13:07:13.777+10:00Does Jim suffer from a chronic cognitive disorder?...Does Jim suffer from a chronic cognitive disorder? He either can't understand simple graphs or is mischievously and intentionally deceptive. Is this how deniers roll?<br /><br />BTW. Brilliant take down Sou. If these guys actually started telling reality how it really is instead of resorting to their childish antics, they might actually be believable. Everytime I read a post on WUWT, they are revealed as charlatans. I mean, really. It doesn't take much to check their claims. A minute or so on Google. Yet this seems too much for your average denier. They prefer their lazy Morton's daemon to be spoon fed with lies and deceptions.Davenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-72619669567535950472014-06-21T12:55:30.355+10:002014-06-21T12:55:30.355+10:00Deniers don't get analogies. Ever. I've no...Deniers don't get analogies. Ever. I've noticed this over and over and over. It's some kind of weird pathology. Some psychologist should study it.jhoptoadnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-78329096728295922332014-06-21T10:46:41.364+10:002014-06-21T10:46:41.364+10:00A nine-year-old isn't capable of self-delusion...A nine-year-old isn't capable of self-delusion to that level. That can only be learned later in a child's development.numerobisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-90589270539921624792014-06-21T01:04:03.988+10:002014-06-21T01:04:03.988+10:00The stuff where they don't accept the SceptSci...The stuff where they don't accept the SceptSci analogy with the dead man with a knife in the back is jaw dropping: I'd have thought even a nine year old could have understood that one.<br /><br />And as for:<br /><br />MarkW June 19, 2014 at 2:02 pm<br />The example is silly because we have firm evidence what killed the man, IE, the knife in the back.<br /><br />I'd have thought the same nine year old when told that they have been measuring the rise in CO2 at Mauna Loa for 50+ years now (and the Wutters are not supposed to deny CO2 is a greenhouse gas) would be able to figure out where the 'knife' is.<br /><br />Just how far down the intellectual scale are they aiming now?Millicentnoreply@blogger.com