tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post3942030427487959586..comments2024-02-12T15:25:44.028+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Conspiracy theorising Lamar Smith can't hack changeSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger54125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-45201238687833512172016-03-05T05:00:29.736+11:002016-03-05T05:00:29.736+11:00I think Ted Cruz should at least get a honorary me...I think Ted Cruz should at least get a honorary mention... ;)0^0https://www.blogger.com/profile/09590270703159793784noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-30461092576492731592016-03-03T16:44:26.832+11:002016-03-03T16:44:26.832+11:00Indeed they are! And they've chosen as an alte...Indeed they are! And they've chosen as an alternative.. money and corruption! And lunacy, of course.<br /><br />And the whole world will be backing the rational establishment over Trump's bizarre oompah-loompah fascism. The GOP's current election cycle is proof of Marx's dictum that history repeats, first as tragedy, then as farce...billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-27524653152695922832016-03-03T16:10:50.818+11:002016-03-03T16:10:50.818+11:00No wonder Trump is getting so much support - it is...No wonder Trump is getting so much support - it is a protest vote.<br /><br />It looks like US voters are tired of the money and corruption.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11552461190113661645noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-20947760072936055312016-03-02T14:21:37.268+11:002016-03-02T14:21:37.268+11:00It is worth noting that the aforementioned Nobel p...It is worth noting that the aforementioned Nobel physicist ... <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2016/01/04/ivar-giaever-nobel-icon-for-climate-deniers" rel="nofollow">associated with Philip Morris for 1-2 decades</a>, which hints at his level of credibility.John Masheynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-3609463157978429452016-03-02T06:59:55.142+11:002016-03-02T06:59:55.142+11:00Now you're getting there, Everett:
Next time ...Now you're getting there, Everett:<br /><br />Next time I see that + Glasgow kiss<br />yellow pages + hitmanmetzomagichttp://metzomagic.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-73793317590988467922016-03-02T05:37:59.723+11:002016-03-02T05:37:59.723+11:00Lamar Smith, Nefarious Conspiracy Theorist ...
&q...Lamar Smith, Nefarious Conspiracy Theorist ...<br /><br />"An example of how this administration promotes its suspect climate agenda can be seen at the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Its employees altered historical climate data to get politically correct results in an attempt to disprove the eighteen year lack of global temperature increases.<br /><br />NOAA conveniently issued its news release that promotes this report just as the administration announced its extensive climate change regulations.<br /><br />NOAA has refused to explain its findings and provide documents to this Committee and the American people. The people have a right to see the data, evaluate it, and know the motivations behind this study.<br /><br />Last week, over 300 respected scientists and experts – which include a Nobel Prize winner, members of the National Academy of Sciences, and former astronauts – sent the Committee a letter that expressed concern over NOAA's efforts to alter historical<br />temperature data. They agree that the issue deserves serious scrutiny.<br /><br />This administration continually impedes Congressional oversight of its extreme climate agenda. Rightfully, Americans should be suspicious."<br /><br />Seriously, you can't make this stuff up!<br />http://docs.house.gov/meetings/SY/SY00/20160202/104399/HHRG-114-SY00-20160202-SD004.pdf<br />http://docs.house.gov/Committee/Calendar/ByEvent.aspx?EventID=104399<br />Everett F Sargenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00201577558036010680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-34034899369080216642016-03-02T04:29:43.122+11:002016-03-02T04:29:43.122+11:00Lamar
Smith
Ted
Cruz
Anthony
Watts
Woy
Spencer
Mon...Lamar<br />Smith<br />Ted<br />Cruz<br />Anthony<br />Watts<br />Woy<br />Spencer<br />Monkers<br />Dick<br />Tol<br />Everett F Sargenthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00201577558036010680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-12492758817220520672016-03-01T15:35:31.614+11:002016-03-01T15:35:31.614+11:00Larry Marshall's plan is to shoot the mesenger...Larry Marshall's plan is to shoot the mesenger and to try to drape the enemy in pretty patriotic colours.<br /><br />It would be fine if it was just his own tech start-up that he was putting on the line, but it's not: he's in fact in treasonous league with the enemy via his evisceration of climate research in Australia. All that Marshall's plan is, when all is said and done, is a plan to sabotage his own side's radar and other early warming systems, and to sell arms to the enemy - but with pretty flowers first painted on the projectiles and bombs.<br /><br />Marshall and his LNP backers are sociopaths.Bernard J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16299073166371273808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-73957741887400964612016-03-01T12:50:18.918+11:002016-03-01T12:50:18.918+11:00Atoms:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/27/science/e...Atoms:<br />http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/27/science/earth/epa-emissions-rules-backed-by-court.html<br />"The judges unanimously dismissed arguments from industry that the science of global warming was not well supported and that the agency had based its judgment on unreliable studies. “This is how science works,” they wrote. “The E.P.A. is not required to reprove the existence of the atom every time it approaches a scientific question.”<br />John Masheynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-61245791373155183572016-03-01T07:31:25.317+11:002016-03-01T07:31:25.317+11:00I believe the "theory of the atom" analo...I believe the "theory of the atom" analogy was part of the opinion from the judge in the court case that smacked down Virginia attorney general Ken Cucinelli's fishing expedition against Michael Mann a few years ago. -- DennisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-49619422704682454682016-03-01T04:53:50.865+11:002016-03-01T04:53:50.865+11:00I feel sorry for the aid who is going to have to w...I feel sorry for the aid who is going to have to waste their time going through all of these emails. Josephnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-73778471698756533582016-03-01T01:27:46.437+11:002016-03-01T01:27:46.437+11:00'social'.'social'.cRR Kampenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07571285063752477448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-20892454812749869952016-02-29T23:59:14.016+11:002016-02-29T23:59:14.016+11:00D.C.Petterson you have a lot of apologising to do!...D.C.Petterson you have a lot of apologising to do!MightyDrunkennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-74753864317859123972016-02-29T19:28:36.510+11:002016-02-29T19:28:36.510+11:00If I were the head of NOAA and an a$$, I would hav...If I were the head of NOAA and an a$$, I would have sticked to the letter of ... the letter, and noticed that Rep. Lamar asked a search for the terms Karl (...) AND CEQ ; therefore, as an honest scientist always willing to get as close to the exact request as possible I would have interpreted this "and" as a mathematical "and". Far less work for Rep. Lamar ... <br /><br />Then again, I would maybe have been a GIGANTIC a$$, noticed that NO temporal limitation was indicated. As a serious and responsible administrator, I would have of course then complied with the investigation. Printing everything - initial mails, replies, automated replies, all with the COMPLETE header. in 6 pts. Recto verso. And shipped everything in front of Lamar's office door while he's inside. <br />Bill including printing,ink costs, printer wearing and shipping expenses would of course have been sent separately at the Congress accounting office ... bratislanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-9668317926354810752016-02-29T15:59:42.957+11:002016-02-29T15:59:42.957+11:00BENGHAZI!!!!!!!!1!!!1!!!!1!!!!BENGHAZI!!!!!!!!1!!!1!!!!1!!!!Joshuahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08058404311263880189noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-24910893099162448932016-02-29T15:27:26.222+11:002016-02-29T15:27:26.222+11:00Exactly, caerbannog. I don't know that I'v...Exactly, caerbannog. I don't know that I've seen any papers with chemical equations in them specifically endorsing the theory of the atom - or not in recent decades. <br /><br />Lamar Smith should take that as evidence that there is no scientific consensus that atoms and electrons and protons and neutrons exist. Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-81997693002022572922016-02-29T14:52:46.036+11:002016-02-29T14:52:46.036+11:00Deleted/reposted to fix a stupid "thinko"...Deleted/reposted to fix a stupid "thinko".<br /><br />From Lamer(sic) Smith's hit-piece:<br /><i><br />The source of this “97 percent” myth is a discredited study that attempted to categorize scholarly articles on climate change by the position the papers took on the issue. But most of the papers never took a position on climate change at all.<br /></i><br /><br />This is a classic DDTP (Dishonest Denier Talking-Point).<br /><br />You can cook up a variation of this talking-point for *any* scientific subject. <br /><br />For example, consider peer-reviewed papers published in epidemiology journals. How many of them explicitly take a position on the "germ theory of disease"? Virtually none will. But does that mean that the "germ theory of disease" is controversial in the scientific community? Of course not! It means that the "germ theory of disease" has been so thoroughly accepted for so many years that there's no longer any reason to bring it up.<br /><br />And as far as the peer-reviewed climate-science literature is concerned, the same holds true for AGW.caerbannoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03896552738444745753noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-31655385578173442502016-02-29T14:50:03.614+11:002016-02-29T14:50:03.614+11:00This comment has been removed by the author.caerbannoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03896552738444745753noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-81893451943820209572016-02-29T13:57:32.972+11:002016-02-29T13:57:32.972+11:00Personally, I think that the world should help Lam...Personally, I think that the world should help Lamar Smith by sending him copies of all their emails wherein any are contained correspondence with the word 'NASA', or any email containing any of his search terms. Attachments included of course.<br /><br />I'm sure that he could find what he's looking for in such a helpfull stream, and he might even be shocked by the other conspiracies that turn up in his forensic examination.Bernard J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16299073166371273808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-89385443155206696322016-02-29T13:28:55.193+11:002016-02-29T13:28:55.193+11:00There are some vague connections in this set of em...There are some vague connections in this set of emails to San Bernardino shooting, couple of accidental deaths of Antarctic researchers, arms smuggling through Europe to Paris by selected Serbians posing as refugees and the Benghazi incident, as "you gotta make some sacrifices to fighr the evil ipcc". <br /><br />Oh dear, i really should stop this, guess I'm also in that spy list you know of.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-20458450263033716682016-02-29T10:38:05.896+11:002016-02-29T10:38:05.896+11:00The second internet also known as water melon road...The second internet also known as water melon road.Victor Venemahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02842816166712285801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-33656324763847001722016-02-29T10:34:43.839+11:002016-02-29T10:34:43.839+11:00That is exactly what I wanted to say: Heartland ha...That is exactly what I wanted to say: Heartland has years and years to build up a network of political activists and only got 300, mostly not relevant signatures.<br /><br />That is a huge contrast to the 3000 signature of actual climate scientists in a few days gathered organically. Victor Venemahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02842816166712285801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-63297154410363767932016-02-29T10:26:55.306+11:002016-02-29T10:26:55.306+11:00VV:
yes, but the ~3000 scientists are actually rea...VV:<br />yes, but the ~3000 scientists are actually real scientists.<br />The ~300 scoured Heartland, every denialists group in AU and Europe, and Houston for signatures ... and some are quite amazing.<br />I'm doing a detailed analysis to figure out the new ones.John Masheynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-56014180349787130922016-02-29T09:06:39.966+11:002016-02-29T09:06:39.966+11:00`There is clearly a second (secret) internet that ...`There is clearly a second (secret) internet that was developed by the IPCC and is used solely by the tens of thousands of scientists in all fields who are in on the conspiracy, plus Al Gore. So the emails on internet 1.0 are just for show.Millicentnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-59643009990510246922016-02-29T08:43:39.309+11:002016-02-29T08:43:39.309+11:00If you start from what Lamar Smith knows, namely t...If you start from what Lamar Smith knows, namely that global warming is a hoax, then the fact that his first email request didn't turn up any evidence of a conspiracy is simply more proof of a conspiracy. I don't see why we should expect this lack of email evidence to convince him that there isn't a conspiracy if Arctic ice melting, flowers blooming earlier in the spring, warblers migrating earlier in the spring, etc. can't convince him that the world is warming.<br /><br />It doesn't seem to have crossed his mind that search terms like temperature, change, and climate would collect almost all my and my colleagues emails written while we worked on this paper - whether they were about the paper or not. Also the idea that Obama or the United Nations would turn up in scientists' emails clearly shows that he doesn't understand the work scientists do.Thomas Petersonnoreply@blogger.com