tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post294337377521007594..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Alec Rawls uncovers an Eemian climate conspiracy @wattsupwiththatSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-12982116111066268422015-07-09T01:03:43.954+10:002015-07-09T01:03:43.954+10:00You have it right, he's a conspiracy camper, p...You have it right, he's a conspiracy camper, probably used that to make a few easy buck$, <a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=M6QC3BLsG8c" rel="nofollow">YouTube of Alec Rawls on a morning TV show with his Flight 93 Memorial conspiracy.</a> And here is <a href="https://m.youtube.com/user/AlecRawls" rel="nofollow">Alec Rawls slightly bizarre YouTube channel.</a>looʞ oɹezhttp://arkansaswildlifephotography.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-33975118369242609092015-07-08T03:39:16.303+10:002015-07-08T03:39:16.303+10:00I find it amazing that a grant review committee ca...I find it amazing that a grant review committee can predict the outcome of research before it is completed in order to deny the funding because the results aren't going to conform to the consensus.CCHolleynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-69503852906428264932015-07-08T03:09:32.412+10:002015-07-08T03:09:32.412+10:00The evidence is that so much of the science indica...The evidence is that so much of the science indicates what he KNOWS to be untrue, that AGW is real and CO2 is the culprit. How else could they all come to that conclusion? pbjammnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-55792632742160100622015-07-08T02:28:34.446+10:002015-07-08T02:28:34.446+10:00"...But that funding is only available to tho..."...But that funding is only available to those who toe the “consensus” line "<br /><br />This is the sort of bullshit that really ticks me off. Where is the evidence that funding in any scientific field is given only to those "who toe the “consensus” line "? That has never been my experience on any grant review committee. A grant application that proposes to re-examine what has already been done stands little chance of success in today's funding environment unless the proposed hypothesis conflicts with established dogma. Mike Pollardnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-82176071969917757462015-07-07T19:46:42.306+10:002015-07-07T19:46:42.306+10:00As well as a nutcase, Rawls appears to be a thorou...As well as a nutcase, Rawls appears to be a thoroughly unpleasant individual.<br /><br />“When members of the Families of Flight 93 began receiving letters and phone calls from Mr. Rawls at their private residences in 2006, they were deeply disturbed, if not angry, over his efforts to invade their privacy”<br /><br />http://www.nps.gov/flni/learn/management/upload/memorialdesignbriefingpaper.pdf<br />verytallguynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-83214245241422010412015-07-07T18:44:00.410+10:002015-07-07T18:44:00.410+10:00Thanks. I knew he promoted wacky climate conspirac...Thanks. I knew he promoted wacky climate conspiracy theories. So I was right that it's not just climate conspiracies - he's a generalist rather than a specialist :)Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-54439068073778743002015-07-07T17:50:52.368+10:002015-07-07T17:50:52.368+10:00I assume you do realise that Rawls is a proper, ce...I assume you do realise that Rawls is a proper, certifiable conspiracy nut of the very highest order?<br /><br />"Not just a mosque, but a terrorist memorial mosque."<br /><br />http://www.rawls.org/flyerflt93.htm<br /><br />See also <br /><br />http://www.crescentofbetrayal.com/verytallguynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-41960831460879444392015-07-07T17:43:50.933+10:002015-07-07T17:43:50.933+10:00Next Mr Rawls will claim doctors in their journals...Next Mr Rawls will claim doctors in their journals never ever mention that heart failure leads to death. <br /><br />Rawls' rant is a perfect example of why Science is best left to Scientists. Clearly, what is 'bloody obvious' to experts in any field may come as a great surprise to a Dunning-Krüger suffering self-taught 'expert with a blog'. Vogon Jeltznoreply@blogger.com