tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post2756860389617727593..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Science deniers at WUWT getting in hot water with Frölicher - but sortedSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-44056344036289450742014-11-22T09:25:21.732+11:002014-11-22T09:25:21.732+11:00MCourtney:
1. Your comment has already been recor...MCourtney:<br /><br />1. Your comment has already been recorded for posterity at WUWT. That was your doing.<br /><br />2. If I changed comments that other people wrote I'd quite rightly be accused of fudging or tampering or misquoting.<br /><br />3. What Jammy said.<br /><br />4. What KR said.<br /><br />5. Read the article again, then the paper.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-69902988392664456922014-11-22T09:14:47.170+11:002014-11-22T09:14:47.170+11:00MCourtney - Your comment was nonsense. We are alre...MCourtney - Your comment was nonsense. We are already committed to further warming until the current level of emissions and radiative imbalance rebalance over time, but we can _always_ make matters _worse_. By, for example, emitting more.<br /><br />Some adaptation to what's already in the pipeline is unavoidable. But mitigation is still less expensive than adaptation, and still a very good idea. KRnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-72490034666386413262014-11-22T09:11:12.778+11:002014-11-22T09:11:12.778+11:00Why is the paper pointless? It does not mean there...Why is the paper pointless? It does not mean there is no possible policy. Also we need to predict what is going to happen to plan adapting. Your comment is accurately filed under "Why try".Jammy Dodgerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08360437479098314946noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-62750356761921199972014-11-22T08:47:05.685+11:002014-11-22T08:47:05.685+11:00I'm MCourtney.
Shame that you don't correc...I'm MCourtney.<br />Shame that you don't correct my typos and still record them for posterity. It's a bit like snapping people on a beach holiday in their inebriated gracefulness and putting them on your own mantelpiece. <br />Strange and just a little creepy.<br /><br />Still, the point remained. That paper was pointless. If it was right then there was no possible policy but the entirely sceptical "adapt".<br /><br />And yet, unfortunately for our side, it was not justified in being right.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-3284770043655865942013-12-03T04:25:39.516+11:002013-12-03T04:25:39.516+11:00Tumble weed...Tumble weed...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com