tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post240286954492475425..comments2024-02-12T15:25:44.028+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Sequel to: Anthony Watts visits Greenland and finds Airport UHI disease!Souhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-10780265738474981442013-09-14T01:38:26.818+10:002013-09-14T01:38:26.818+10:00Yes he did. No snide remarks either.Yes he did. No snide remarks either.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-1335369631114346352013-09-14T00:21:06.795+10:002013-09-14T00:21:06.795+10:00I have to admit, I was wrong. Watts did print an ...I have to admit, I was wrong. Watts did print an acknowledgement of this -- buried deep in his "Hot Sheet" yesterday.Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-82578622624582765552013-09-13T23:30:24.531+10:002013-09-13T23:30:24.531+10:00That's okay, BBD. If 9/11 gets to be a proble...That's okay, BBD. If 9/11 gets to be a problem I'll add it to the comment policy. Hopefully I won't have to.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-63044015531352728952013-09-13T23:21:09.714+10:002013-09-13T23:21:09.714+10:00To be absolutely clear on this, "Brad Keyes&q...To be absolutely clear on this, "Brad Keyes" explicitly stated on several occasions that this was a pseudonym. So rest assured, I am not trying to "out" anyone here in the sense of breaching their anonymity (a banning offence if there ever was one). BBDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10687930416706386215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-74995862397591753662013-09-13T22:55:51.490+10:002013-09-13T22:55:51.490+10:00Sou
You cannot "out" a pseudonym!
You ...Sou<br /><br />You cannot "out" a pseudonym!<br /><br />You should wonder why a poster here compares another to a "9/11 Truther" though. The core issue here is good faith. I don't need to say more about good faith and who demonstrates a lack of it, surely? BBDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10687930416706386215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-18110390753146827962013-09-13T15:47:37.447+10:002013-09-13T15:47:37.447+10:00Please guys, there is no more need for speculation...Please guys, there is no more need for speculation of identities. <br /><br />HotWhopper doesn't approve of "outing" guests and in this case, Thomas Murphy is who he says he is. Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-64111335438357793292013-09-13T15:36:30.067+10:002013-09-13T15:36:30.067+10:00Thanks, Thomas. Maybe he read it here first :)Thanks, Thomas. Maybe he read it here first :)Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-27310803708370964932013-09-13T09:16:57.145+10:002013-09-13T09:16:57.145+10:00That's... fascinating.
And *so* like Brad. T...That's... fascinating. <br /><br />And *so* like Brad. The resemblance is... unfortunate.BBDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10687930416706386215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-78247719821147528222013-09-12T19:53:03.357+10:002013-09-12T19:53:03.357+10:00BK = DKBK = DKbillnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-16647838001215946412013-09-12T19:45:58.087+10:002013-09-12T19:45:58.087+10:00Thomas Murphy is not behaving badly like Brad Keye...Thomas Murphy is not behaving badly like Brad Keyes did, which earned him the ban. As long as that remains the case then Thomas Murphy will be welcome here.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-56183227604153696182013-09-12T19:39:56.243+10:002013-09-12T19:39:56.243+10:00cRR Kampen
Hello again. "TM" denies bei...cRR Kampen<br /><br />Hello again. "TM" denies being a sock of "Brad Keyes" but like you, I don't really believe him. <br /><br />He must deny this, because Sou banned "Brad Keyes" very shortly after he started trying to infest this blog.<br /><br />I suspect "TM" will evolve into a problem here because he is indeed "BK", and "BK" is a problem wherever he goes.<br /><br />We shall see. BBDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10687930416706386215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-33985365895398790552013-09-12T18:37:42.409+10:002013-09-12T18:37:42.409+10:00Bradthing get back under your rock.Bradthing get back under your rock.cRR Kampenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07571285063752477448noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-5886287620280987522013-09-12T12:26:40.592+10:002013-09-12T12:26:40.592+10:00I'd say Thomas Murphy is overly optimistic abo...I'd say <a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/09/sequel-to-anthony-watts-visits.html?showComment=1378926365602#c8874290870974448575" rel="nofollow">Thomas Murphy</a> is overly optimistic about Anthony Watts' acknowledgement. <br /><br />It's now about two days since <a href="https://twitter.com/capitalweather/status/377475869742465024" rel="nofollow">@capitalweather tweeted the news</a> directly to Anthony, and six other people retweeted it so Anthony would have got the message well and truly. <br /><br />Anthony watches tweets addressed to him closely. Not only that but he only follows 75 people on Twitter and @capitalweather is one of them. Also I'd expect that he reads <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2013/09/10/confirmed-greenland-recorded-hottest-temperature-in-modern-record-this-summer/" rel="nofollow">Capital Weather Gang's blog</a> since it was their original article that prompted him to write his UHI disease post, so I don't imagine he missed the news.<br /><br />Maybe, just like <a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2013/08/anthony-watts-of-wuwt-gets-noticed-by.html" rel="nofollow">he bombed @capitalweather with tweets</a>, he's waiting for the same in return :(Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-90822111987585728852013-09-12T08:38:47.617+10:002013-09-12T08:38:47.617+10:00Thomas, you can use the word "catastrophic&qu...Thomas, you can use the word "catastrophic" as much as you like. As can Holdren.<br /><br />But when you use CAGW, you lose.<br /><br />Always.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-89256407978214498092013-09-12T06:59:14.624+10:002013-09-12T06:59:14.624+10:00Not only does TM scupper himself with his crude at...Not only does TM scupper himself with his crude attempt at framing, he also exiles himself from rational discussion by implicitly denying the data. Trying to pretend that nothing essential has changed between 1915 and 2013 is more than merely daft, it is fundamentally dishonest. <br /><br />All this misrepresentation, dishonesty and data denial? Where *will* it lead?BBDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10687930416706386215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-46825744400939569862013-09-12T06:44:03.703+10:002013-09-12T06:44:03.703+10:00Thomas, remember that if you use the term "CA...Thomas, remember that if you use the term "CAGW" you lose.<br /><br />Always.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-10318365761321298952013-09-12T02:23:36.196+10:002013-09-12T02:23:36.196+10:00To answer your question: no.To answer your question: no.Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.com