tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post1444811258433097882..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: David Archibald's Funny Sunny PredictionSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-78765652289367139982013-06-04T14:24:37.137+10:002013-06-04T14:24:37.137+10:00This will rival the McLean '1955 or even earli...This will rival the McLean '1955 or even earlier' prediction!billnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-65873628330688907892013-06-04T12:29:08.534+10:002013-06-04T12:29:08.534+10:00Good point. However IMO the duration of the solar...Good point. However IMO the duration of the solar cycle is the least of his problems :)Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-2352361761960984922013-06-04T07:44:29.854+10:002013-06-04T07:44:29.854+10:00At one point Archibald says that the solar maximum...At one point Archibald says that the solar maximum is past so he can be certain of his prediction:<br /><br />"Over Solar Cycle 23 the average temperature of the CET was 10.4°C so the model predicts that the average over Solar Cycle 24 will be 9.0°C. For the first four years of Solar Cycle 24, it has averaged 9.8°C. For the prediction to hold from here, the average temperature over the remainder of the cycle will have to be 8.7°C. The average temperature of 2010 was 8.8°C – only 0.1°C more than what is needed from here. With solar maximum of Solar Cycle 24 now past us, the prediction is in the bag." <br /><br />Shouldn't he have asked the Sun first? It is predicted, following an upsurge of activity in May, to have a second peak sometime in the summer.<br /><br />http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml<br /><br />Ruddy nuisance, this Sun thing. Won't do as its told.Catmandohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12313870265499015076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-485302644830668772013-06-04T02:54:00.462+10:002013-06-04T02:54:00.462+10:00Archiblad 2006 is clearly one of the worst climate...Archiblad 2006 is clearly one of the worst climate papers ever.Lars Karlssonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06158469980966810882noreply@blogger.com