tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post917254485417005534..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Desperate Deniers Part 4: Anthony Watts is shame-proof despite all his bloopers about NOAASouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-56937310753801361962016-01-24T18:36:50.513+11:002016-01-24T18:36:50.513+11:00Thanks Katy. I started to look for your chart when...Thanks Katy. I started to look for your chart when I wrote this up, but misplaced the link. Hope you don't mind me putting it in the article now.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-27046389920861881862016-01-24T17:52:15.375+11:002016-01-24T17:52:15.375+11:00Tom Nelson (@tan123) tweets currently running at a...Tom Nelson (@tan123) tweets currently running at about <a href="http://climatechatter.wordpress.com/2015/09/03/september-2015-v-1-2-years-of-tweeting/" rel="nofollow">65 per day!</a> (click image to enlarge) KatyDhttps://climatechatter.wordpress.com/about/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-89841657113151580812016-01-24T06:56:20.194+11:002016-01-24T06:56:20.194+11:00Looking through the WUWT comments I came across a ...Looking through the WUWT comments I came across a post by Roger Pielke Sr., who misrepresents Carl Mears and the latter's long record of published research into the technical details and uncertainties of satellite microwave-emission derived atmospheric temperatures thusly:<br /><br /><i>The final arbitrator of these issues will be the scientific community. however, John and Roy need to prepare a robust response to these criticisms of Mears (or publicly accept them). That Mears seems to denigrate his own analysis is remarkable. One wonders why he is even funded for that work?<br />Roger A. Pielke Sr. </i><br /><br />Considering Pielke is one of the very, very few contrarians with a decent research record (you can count them on one hand, with fingers to spare), this cheap shot is disappointing. But thinking back, RP Sr. has occasionally resorted to similar tactics in the past.Magmanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-83379239795853698812016-01-24T04:38:27.923+11:002016-01-24T04:38:27.923+11:00CRN not USHCN, which is 2nd IIRC the concall corre...CRN not USHCN, which is 2nd IIRC the concall correctly.Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-21339435650256783232016-01-23T22:19:55.602+11:002016-01-23T22:19:55.602+11:00UAH is up to version 6, they've been adjusting...UAH is up to version 6, they've been adjusting their records quite a bit over the last few years. I know some industrious people did a graph comparing 5.6 and 6, but could it be done using UAH versions 1,2,3,4,5 as well? It would be interesting to see how much the change in calculation from it's original implementation. Geoffnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-70522900588440375672016-01-23T20:02:10.662+11:002016-01-23T20:02:10.662+11:00That's the way it's always done. Tell a li...That's the way it's always done. Tell a lie, use a straight face, support it with threats, insinuations, fake allegations, admit no doubt. Above all, admit no error. When can we expect to see Watts on Oprah admitting it was all one big lie.Catmandohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12313870265499015076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-65188663574450673832016-01-23T19:19:17.776+11:002016-01-23T19:19:17.776+11:00"He has no shame"
Reminds me in a way o..."He has no shame"<br /><br />Reminds me in a way of Lance Armstrong <br /><br />Simple bare faced lies, aggression, and relentlessly attacking anyone who calls you out <br /><br />Combined with the sycophantic gullibility of his supporters and can be quite effective, for a time anywayTadaaahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07736188830660481871noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-32419928375227535112016-01-23T19:02:37.302+11:002016-01-23T19:02:37.302+11:00Thanks, Mark. You are correct - I missed that, but...Thanks, Mark. You are correct - I missed that, but have tried to make amends:)<br /><br /><a href="http://blog.hotwhopper.com/2016/01/desperate-deniers-part-5-anthony.html" rel="nofollow">Desperate Deniers Part 5 - Anthony "surface station" Watts flunks NOAA temperature chart 101</a>Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-39283524543208521552016-01-23T17:05:36.316+11:002016-01-23T17:05:36.316+11:00CRN not USHCN, which is 2nd IIRC the concall corre...CRN not USHCN, which is 2nd IIRC the concall correctly.Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-3418241631150719792016-01-23T16:20:18.849+11:002016-01-23T16:20:18.849+11:002015 comes in third for the USA? Per NOAA's Na...2015 comes in third for the USA? Per NOAA's National Overview it comes in second: "In 2015, the contiguous United States (CONUS) average temperature was 54.4°F, 2.4°F above the 20th century average. This was the second warmest year in the 121-year period of record for the CONUS."<br /><br />Yet another blooper? <br /><br />http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/images/us/2015/ann/CONUS-horserace-ann-2015-lg.pngMarknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-53144832746560041912016-01-23T15:27:50.051+11:002016-01-23T15:27:50.051+11:00I see dbstealey is continuing with his latest ridi...I see dbstealey is continuing with his latest ridiculous personal meme:<br /><br />"Wake me if you can find verifiable, testable, empirical measurements quantifying the fraction of AGW out of all global warming"<br /><br />It seems we must break out our AGW measuring devices.<br /><br />But it does reminds me of a line from Piers Plowman:<br /><br />"Pleading the law for pennies and pounds,<br />And never for love of our Lord unloosing their lips.<br />You might better measure the mist on the Malvern hills,<br />Than get a sound out of their mouth unless money were showed."<br /><br />Langland was referring to lawyers, but these days it might be as well pointed at the Heartland Institute and their like.Millicentnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-80631253023851357792016-01-23T15:10:53.857+11:002016-01-23T15:10:53.857+11:00If only Anthony paid more attention to Hotwhopper ...If only Anthony paid more attention to Hotwhopper he might have taken the advice to be found here: the less Anthony contributes to his blog the less stupid he seems.Millicentnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-62506086323511513482016-01-23T13:11:04.096+11:002016-01-23T13:11:04.096+11:00I think the list can be found in the targets of Jo...I think the list can be found in the targets of Josh's "cartoons".Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-58809207042602583572016-01-23T13:06:05.880+11:002016-01-23T13:06:05.880+11:00An entire blog post filled with pointless grade sc...An entire blog post filled with pointless grade school arithmetic, conspiracy theories, corrections, and blaming others for Watts's own failure to understand a simple paragraph.<br /><br />WUWT appears to be running out of steam and hot air.<br /><br />With respect to the cartoon of Gavin Schmidt, is there a list of the climate scientists who've been smeared by the denial movement?<br /><br />Off the top of my head I can think of Mann, Schmidt, Trenberth, Santer, Hansen, Jones and Schneider. I would be interested in a more complete listing but don't want to reinvent the wheel.Magmanoreply@blogger.com