tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post6394901707346704332..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Green with EnvySouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-59101456156262375832013-03-31T14:53:56.577+11:002013-03-31T14:53:56.577+11:00Good one - thanks Peter :D That's an interest...Good one - thanks Peter :D That's an interesting discussion board.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-5258269173044358922013-03-31T06:19:23.984+11:002013-03-31T06:19:23.984+11:00sorry about the typos. :-(sorry about the typos. :-(citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-22341767610674788172013-03-31T06:18:20.710+11:002013-03-31T06:18:20.710+11:00Sou you have your bones to pick with HotCopper {I ...Sou you have your bones to pick with HotCopper {I visited and their intro page was enough to chase me away. Life's too short.}<br /><br />And I got my bone to pick with fake skeptics in particular the theater over at SkepticForum.<br /><br />After I shared a little something I posted after sharing a quotes and links from this post and "Has Anthony Watts Become a Leftist-Warmist?" and listened to that interview with Anthony Watts, I couldn't resist posting this:<br />~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<br /><br />"Oy vey,<br />What a revealing interview - Anthony Watts clearly exposes his tunnel vision and loopy thinking.<br /><br />And the interviewer, <br />jeez, talk about a text book example of one sided {dare I say goal oriented} questioning.<br /><br />Quote [ Watts himself has said the reason he backed off from viewing global warming as a threat was because he feared that policies to address the problem might involve a rise in taxation. (See about 58 seconds into this video interview = http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmIJCGQzCiU ]<br />~ ~ ~<br /><br />For all the talk about the profit motive influencing scientists, <br />not one question about the masses of money seeded by a very few {incredibly wealthy and disgusting hubristic and frighteningly shallow self-obsessive thinking} who through their "ThinkTank" have strategically attacked science as though it was a football game and winning was all that mattered - rather than a struggle to better understand.<br /><br />We see that right here at SkepticForum - where utter nonsense can be repeated endlessly and all rhetorical tricks are welcome - because the arguing is considered more important than the learning."<br /><br />http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=19892citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.com