tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post337807875658719153..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: WUWT arrives late to the IPCC partySouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-37977914269406812542013-08-21T13:31:40.650+10:002013-08-21T13:31:40.650+10:00Of course it's a load of BS or complete idiocy...Of course it's a load of BS or complete idiocy. It's a "dog ate my homework" excuse - "it wasn't my fault it was the other guy" - without a shred of shame or embarrassment much less any sign of an apology. In their world "real men" don't eat quiche and "real men" don't apologise or back down. Cowards!<br /><br />Why would either Tony remove the headline? That's all that his readers want to read. Few of the WUWT crowd would read the comments - even most of the people who write comments there don't read what anyone else has written. IPCC is enough to get them going.<br /><br />Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-67709735730705369522013-08-21T13:06:47.479+10:002013-08-21T13:06:47.479+10:00And of course the idiot (the Tony whatever, rather...And of course the idiot (the Tony whatever, rather than Willard) now claims that he changed his email two days before the message, WTF, and he didn't continue to monitor it or put a forward on it? For two days?! Right. <br /><br />I've had the same email address for more than 10 years and the one before that for about 8 years (yeah, free vs. $30US is a big difference). When I moved it I continued to monitor the old one for a couple of months afterwards and told all of the people in my contacts list (many fewer a dozen years ago, because not everyone used email) about the change. Why didn't Tony do this for a couple of days? What a fucking clown.<br /><br />Then Tony complains about a 6 month delay. Actually they sent the email to him the day after the correction was posted. Is that a delay?<br /><br />And then he complains about the maps. Right. The IPCC is not going to make a change to an already published report. As everyone knows (including semiconductor manufacturers, lord knows I've read enough errata sheets in my life) corrections are issued as errata.<br /><br />What a clown. Why not get the host of the damn site to take down a sadly erroneous post which just promotes a totally erroneous view of the IPCC. Instead just blame the IPCC which did exactly what it was supposed to do. Tony and Tony have no shame.<br /><br />There, did I come off as angry enough? (And probably way to incoherent since I tried to resize the window while writing...)Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-42504616922638048582013-08-21T10:53:26.975+10:002013-08-21T10:53:26.975+10:00One of the other strong lines of commenting was &q...One of the other strong lines of commenting was "they didn't follow their protocol". Except they did. Tony just lied about never receiving a response at the end of the process -- one day after the PDF was prepared.<br /><br />Ooops.Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-46719599760100386092013-08-21T07:19:31.212+10:002013-08-21T07:19:31.212+10:00Notice how Anthony has to attribute blame even tho...Notice how Anthony has to attribute blame even though he's the one who made the first mistake - not checking out the fact the error had been picked up and made public. And how he avoids any apology or correction to his article or the headline.<br /><br />I'm surprised Anthony didn't just come out and say it's the IPCC's fault for not making sure Tony Thomas got the second email.<br /><br />Now he's complaining that the IPCC didn't bow down in awe at getting an email from Anthony Watts Denier and bagger supreme of the IPCC, and didn't answer his "question". That the IPCC even acknowledged his rude email is showing that they, unlike Anthony, have a sense of propriety. Easy to see why Anthony never amounted to anything outside of blogging. He doesn't know the first thing about polite discourse.<br /><br />Meanwhile, Tony Thomas has done a dash. I'm ashamed to say he's a product not just of Australia, but probably of Melbourne. Not that I've ever come across him before, but he wrote an article for Quadrant, a right wing political rag. We have managed to sprout some nutjobs over the years.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-16344005812591110412013-08-21T06:56:00.172+10:002013-08-21T06:56:00.172+10:00It must have disappointed Anthony that the IPCC re...It must have disappointed Anthony that the IPCC responded because that rather quashes all the "they never listen" style comments.Catmandohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12313870265499015076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-87166540853251485362013-08-21T06:40:58.230+10:002013-08-21T06:40:58.230+10:00I'm trying to think of some kind of suitable r...I'm trying to think of some kind of suitable response to your comment but, I too, am somewhat lost for words!Wotts Up With That Bloghttp://wottsupwiththatblog.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-80522437959656492892013-08-21T05:37:47.460+10:002013-08-21T05:37:47.460+10:00IPCC issue erratum for defunct graphic in out of p...IPCC issue erratum for defunct graphic in out of print historic document. The world is aghast.<br /><br />An IPCC Staffer actually comments and points out that the headline has not a grain of truth...<br /><br />Watts' response ...<i>The IPCC reads WUWT, and directly responds below</i><br /><br />Is there no end to the narcissism?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-23656984349199553792013-08-21T05:15:05.439+10:002013-08-21T05:15:05.439+10:00There's a Courtney junior?!
I didn't know...There's a Courtney junior?!<br /><br />I didn't know. <br /><br />The horror, the horror.BBDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10687930416706386215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-73190294696835149132013-08-21T02:06:09.115+10:002013-08-21T02:06:09.115+10:00Neither would I :)Neither would I :)Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-89899603017613603122013-08-21T01:17:43.650+10:002013-08-21T01:17:43.650+10:00Tony wouldn't have a story if the headline rea...Tony wouldn't have a story if the headline read "IPCC has corrected a minor error in 1995 report". Rattus Norvegicushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03449457204330125792noreply@blogger.com