tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post1569757739022821038..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: We can ignore everything Anthony Watts says because of his denier affiliationsSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-21994001346154290242014-04-03T13:47:09.204+11:002014-04-03T13:47:09.204+11:00I think it's interesting that they have this h...I think it's interesting that they have this highly committed goal of saving the world from the evil Agenda21 scheme that is going to kill BILLIONS of poor people, and they are the ONLY people who can save the SHEEPLE from this conspiracy but ...<br /><br />... they can't be bothered forking out $US30 once or twice a month to access the things they want to criticize.<br /><br />It's as if they don't really care all that much ... Captain Flashheartnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-59432431773683778772014-04-03T13:10:01.224+11:002014-04-03T13:10:01.224+11:00WUWT authors also have a penchant for critiquing j...WUWT authors also have a penchant for <a href="http://archive.is/iG2FX" rel="nofollow">critiquing journal articles they haven't read</a> because they are paywalled.<br /><br />I can understand the frustration but if they can't get access then they have no business arguing against them.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12083190014669867976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-87414719976713910702014-04-02T20:16:52.301+11:002014-04-02T20:16:52.301+11:00Good question, David.
"Claim" = a free ...Good question, David.<br /><br />"Claim" = a free for all trashing because it's real science.<br />"Study" = it's up to the crowd to decide.<br /><br />You've given me an idea for something to look into. Anthony rarely writes his own material and I suspect he rarely finds his own material either.Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-89271098132132387982014-04-02T18:07:41.798+11:002014-04-02T18:07:41.798+11:00Why is it that a NSIDC paper is a "claim"...Why is it that a NSIDC paper is a "claim" but a <a href="http://archive.is/tIbVj" rel="nofollow">paper </a>WUWT thinks counters AGW is a "study"?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12083190014669867976noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-44555115257809731072014-04-02T17:00:48.315+11:002014-04-02T17:00:48.315+11:00"we"? "our"?
Pielkes all the ..."we"? "our"?<br /><br />Pielkes all the way down...Marconoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-39519556098176452032014-04-02T10:58:00.283+11:002014-04-02T10:58:00.283+11:00ha ha. Good one.
In denier land, 35 years plus of...ha ha. Good one.<br /><br />In denier land, 35 years plus of rapidly melting Arctic sea ice is but the blink of an eye and proves nothing at all, a ten year "pause" in global surface temperatures proves climate science is a hoax and we're heading for an ice age, any day now!Souhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-42068183660562273002014-04-02T09:58:14.090+11:002014-04-02T09:58:14.090+11:00This is hilariously, uproariously funny:
"On...This is hilariously, uproariously funny:<br /><br />"One thing I tend to notice about Earthly geological and atmospheric processes is that they tend to act on time spans than exceed human lifetimes, sometimes being orders of magnitudes longer. ... Making claims that they know exactly what the cause is might very well bite them in a few years or few decades."<br /><br />What about the "hiatus" of 15 years (or so), ignoring all other years on record? Anthony Watts have by his own words admitted that the "hiatus" is to short to conclude anything.<br /><br />One should require deniers to at least be consistent in their arguments to be taken seriously and not twist them to suit whatever is the subject du jour. I think that Anthony Watts have moved beyond denier and is now just seeing conspiracies everywhere.<br /><br />I do wonder how much influence he has nowadays outside his followers, perhaps letting him quietly be forgotten would be the best option?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-71747248995514802672014-04-02T08:17:13.904+11:002014-04-02T08:17:13.904+11:00Interesting Roger Pielke Sr (unintentionally?) giv...Interesting Roger Pielke Sr (unintentionally?) gives an explanation for the slowdown in surface temperatures and why more heat went into the ocean.<br /><br /><a href="http://archive.is/OYKAM" rel="nofollow">Roger A. Pielke Sr. says</a>:<br /><i>April 1, 2014 at 11:48 am<br />On the sea ice/lack of sea ice feedback, it is more complex than is commonly presented since a loss of sea ice in the summer actually results in less heat going into the atmosphere even though more is entering the climate system (the ocean). We discuss this in our article<br />Pielke, R.A., 2001: Earth system modeling — An integrated assessment tool for environmental studies. In: Present and Future of Modeling Global Environmental Change: Toward Integrated Modeling, T. Matsuno and H. Kida, Eds., Terra Scientific Publishing Company, Tokyo, Japan, 311-337.<br />http://pielkeclimatesci.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/cb-35.pdf<br /></i>Victor Venemahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02842816166712285801noreply@blogger.com