tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post1472172896703443251..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: On Seeps and SCAMS Part I: Lessons for Climate ScientistsSouhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-70353470807661048292015-05-18T12:57:47.613+10:002015-05-18T12:57:47.613+10:00Fascinating stuff. Less hilarious than the infamou...Fascinating stuff. Less hilarious than the infamous recursive fury paper, but arguably of more interest.<br /><br />You do have a small typo in your text: "Compare that to the following chart, which also shows the long term linear trend from 1950 to 2007, together with the 15 year linear trend from 1999 to 2007."<br /><br />It should be "...the 15 year linear trend from 1999 to 2013."<br /><br />Cheers.Contrail Chooknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-7438428125883176282015-05-14T18:44:13.087+10:002015-05-14T18:44:13.087+10:00I'm most pleased to see this paper on the spri...I'm most pleased to see this paper on the springboard. As one of the rather small band of people who has resisted succumbing to the "pause" meme I'm pleased that Stephan faced this psychology face-on and pointed out the facts.<br /><br />Speaking of facts, Tamino's back at work and has devastated those who claim "pause":<br /><br /><a href="https://tamino.wordpress.com/2015/04/30/slowdown-skeptic/" rel="nofollow">https://tamino.wordpress.com/2015/04/30/slowdown-skeptic/</a><br /><br />FFS, can we put this "no warming for x years" nonsense to bed?Bernard J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16299073166371273808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-2722927062264309362015-05-14T18:42:29.506+10:002015-05-14T18:42:29.506+10:00This comment has been removed by the author.Bernard J.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16299073166371273808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-59026848548942767792015-05-14T15:28:01.439+10:002015-05-14T15:28:01.439+10:00Excellent Sou. This has been long over due! Than...Excellent Sou. This has been long over due! Thanks for reporting on it. Looking forward to reading, and sharing, the next two.citizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-59301594579603442222015-05-14T03:19:13.211+10:002015-05-14T03:19:13.211+10:00Some of these revisions happen as all the data fin...Some of these revisions happen as all the data finally makes it in.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-13147574262933093662015-05-14T03:00:14.216+10:002015-05-14T03:00:14.216+10:00Breaking: The GISTEMP figure for April has come in...Breaking: The GISTEMP figure for April has come in just in the past few hrs, and as Nick Stokes estimated via his own Temp LS 'product', it comes in at exactly 0.1C lower than the previous month.<br /><br />BUT (and this is a big but!), it seems that a lot of previous numbers have changed as well. The entire 2014 average, for instance, have been revised back up from 67/66 to 68/67. And Mar 2015, which was 84 last time I looked, has been bumped up to 85. The Jan and Feb 2015 numbers may also have changed.<br /><br />Wassup? Is this a new version of GISTEMP? I'm guessing not because it's at the same V3 URL it always was:<br /><br />http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt<br /><br />In any case, this is not gonna go down well in Deniersville. There will be wailing and gnashing of teeth, oh yes :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com