tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post1103216672359817605..comments2024-03-25T05:30:23.847+11:00Comments on HotWhopper: Deluded deniers: Will WUWT correct all its errors about National Geographic?Souhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08818999735123752034noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-44257727556548033402014-09-06T03:52:08.693+10:002014-09-06T03:52:08.693+10:00For what it's worth I've also done a revie...For what it's worth I've also done a review of this and collected appropriate links to studies and reports and other further information that demonstrates the lie to Anthony's antics - Information for the sharing<br /><br />Anthony Watts attacks National Geographic Magazine<br />http://whatsupwiththatwatts.blogspot.com/2014/09/anthony-watts-attacks-national.html<br /><br />also<br />Anthony Watts about that Sea Level Rise<br />Anthony Watts about those Glaciers on Kilimanjaro<br />Anthony Watts about those Himalayan Glacierscitizenschallengehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04559990934735912814noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-24944198072806401152014-09-02T09:44:17.863+10:002014-09-02T09:44:17.863+10:00Sou's considered reply can be seen above. We&#...Sou's considered reply can be seen above. We're not going to read all the comments; Sou does that for us, which is a service above and beyond, and much appreciated.<br /><br />AGW deniers have been claiming that predictions have failed since the whole program started. Having heard themselves say it way back when they will continue to believe themselves, whatever happens. Hence poor Geoffrey's delusions and the baying of Watts's claque.Cugelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-4929160738570256572014-09-02T08:50:11.790+10:002014-09-02T08:50:11.790+10:00Dave yes it was posted yesterday. But in the comme...Dave yes it was posted yesterday. But in the comments Geoff admits its an old piece, he wrote it a year ago. He has posted it as he believes the points he makes are even more valid today. I have no criticism of Sou's comments. I am simply observing the story is not meant literally regarding a nat geo september 2014 issue. Its just a device to highlight how poorly the 2004 article measures up against 2014 reality. As to how well it does that I will leave you to consider. Billy Bobnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-75089815287124687202014-09-02T08:07:01.038+10:002014-09-02T08:07:01.038+10:00Is that it? You do realise that it was Watt who pu...Is that it? You do realise that it was Watt who put up the article just yesterday don't you? A year old article by your reckoning. Really does show how desperate Watt is if he is having to dredge up such old material.<br /><br />Your irony meter must be broken.<br /><br />So you couldn't take down even one of Sou's comments, but had to resort to the old favourite, ad hom. You are right. You can't even make a smart comment, all that you could muster is a really dumb comment. Davenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-31212961966365916262014-09-02T07:03:47.741+10:002014-09-02T07:03:47.741+10:00OK, so even I can't make a smart comment about...OK, so even I can't make a smart comment about this one, it is indeed a dumb post. However, and here you need to have actually read the comments I-beam, Geoff wrote this article a year ago. He also isn't really serious about Nat Geo publishing it you know. Gawd you guys are sooo literal.Billy Bobnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2313427464944392482.post-20576880877446249112014-09-01T23:06:34.413+10:002014-09-01T23:06:34.413+10:00Another tedious bit of denier grandstanding. A mom...Another tedious bit of denier grandstanding. A moment's reflection would have told our Geoff that NatGeo would have its story publishing schedule locked in at least a year in advance. Does he think those articles of faraway expeditions, and seasonally-relevant stories aren't planned far in advance? Making his grand suggestion on the week the September 2014 issue actually hits the newsstands is a bit late.I-beamnoreply@blogger.com