I read this at WUWT and thought, what a plonker.
charles the moderator says (my bold italics):
October 5, 2013 at 5:58 pm
May I suggest you turn your talent of finding patterns in random correlations and squiggles to humorous subjects such as: [inserted graphic of pirates]
At least your posts could then possess some redeeming quality or social value as opposed to the continued detritus that simply continues to pull down the credibility of this site.
I've some questions for charles the moderator:
- Does he really and truly think that WUWT has any credibility to pull down?
- What makes charles the moderator think that Anthony Watts is seeking credibility? If he was, why would he put up so many incredible articles?
- Isn't it about time charles the moderator put the same suggestion to Anthony Watts himself? And no, bad cartoons by Josh don't count.
(David "funny sunny" Archibald's latest effort is archived here. He didn't get much applause except from hard-core deniers like Janice Moore, who'll clap anyone who rejects science no matter what silliness they write.)